The lawyer pointed to the detainees of the cause as authors of a subtraction. He explained that two of the aforementioned coordinated to disappear the child and that “the sexual delivery of a child” is common in Corrientes.
In the last hours, the case on the disappearance of Loan Peña threw new cryptic details. The lawyer of the child’s parents, Juan Pablo GallegoHe argued that the child never left the province of Corrientes and believes that two of the seven accused by the fact collaborated for a delivery and abduction for sexual purposes. It’s about Daniel “Fierrito” Ramírez and Carlos Pérez.
The content you want to access is exclusive to subscribers.
“We have the quasi -stars that they could not get him out of currents, If at some point they tried to do it, which I doubt. Our suspicion, and I have been saying it, revolves around Pérez and (María Victoria) Caillava. I have no doubt that they are the ones who took it, ”said the lawyer in an interview.


Juan Pablo Gallego’s words about a possible subtraction for Loan’s abuse
According to Gallego, The seven detainees -Pérez and Ramírez, along with accused of child abduction and currently processed with preventive detention, along with Caillava, Antonio Benítez, Mónica del Carmen Millapi, Laudelina Peña and Walter Maciel- They are the final authors of subtraction and kidnapping. Gallego explains that “the sexual delivery of a child in exchange for an economic benefit” is common in Corrientes.
“There was never a narco track or a situation that links trafficking in people,” he said, although he also suspects that sexual abuse could have occurred, he told Infobae. “If there was abuse, the suspicions are on Pérez, and in the second instance, about Ramírez. But the most logical thing seems the figure that Ramírez gives it to Pérez and disappears from the scene, “he explained.
Loan Peña.jpg

Gallego explains that “the sexual delivery of a child in exchange for an economic benefit” is common in Corrientes.
The voice
Loan case: “What time will they return it”, the conversation between Laudelina and Caillava that could be key
Waiting for the Federal Chamber to resolve if it confirms the prosecutions of those imputed by the subtraction and concealment and also the situation of the defendants in the related cause, the complaint continues with the accusations and, waiting for the possibility of new expertise , A key point arose about a telephone conversation.
Galicianwho heads the complaint, said there are elements to analyze between The call that Laudelina Peña and María Victoria Caillava hadwhere a planning and recognition of the “Macabro Plan” They carried out.
Source: Ambito

I’m a recent graduate of the University of Missouri with a degree in journalism. I started working as a news reporter for 24 Hours World about two years ago, and I’ve been writing articles ever since. My main focus is automotive news, but I’ve also written about politics, lifestyle, and entertainment.