Feldman filed the brief asking that Lorenzini be removed from his position due to “manifest ignorance of the law or lack of any other essential aptitude for the exercise of the judicial function, repeatedly demonstrated”, and “repeated failure to comply with the obligations of the position imposed by the Constitution”.
For Feldman, “the resolutions grossly out of line with the law” that assigns to Lorenzini they are the manifestation “of the methodical and systematic procedure that the defendant has always had towards the bankrupt, for the specific benefit of certain individuals”.
In that sense, he later considered that the magistrate revealed “not only a disregard for current regulations, but also lack of impartiality which should take precedence over all magistrates”.
Feldman reproaches Lorenzini for having declared the contest opening “despite the fact that the debtor in his presentation did not detail his assets by omitting to report his economic group and did not take into account the failure to present the last balance.”
It also blames him for not having taken “any measure, not even precautionary, regarding the simulated transfer of 16.67% of the Renova actions in favor of Renaiscoof the group Viterra-Glencoreoccurred two days before declaring in default of payments”.
Another of the points attributed to him is having allowed “a vote to be Manifestly abusive bankruptcy proposal regarding the time of payment and the removal that the creditors will suffer, and without all the elements to know the scope of the same being available to them”.
He also recalled that “toBefore the intervention decree issued by the national government (Lorenzini) he immediately reinstated in the administration the same directors who defaulted the company and that they were suspected of committing crimes of fraud”.
“While the criminal courts of Rosario collect evidence and, prima facie, believe they have perpetrated crimes of fraudulent administrationfraud, false balances and judicial disobedience on the part of the directors of the bankrupt, the Reconquista bankruptcy court acts as if none of this happened, “he added.
Feldman concluded that “allowing Judge Lorenzini to proceed with this action puts the Santa judiciary within range of federal intervention,” and requested that it be suspended.
Regarding the Vicentin company, the Supreme Court will have to decide next Tuesday if the avocamiento process initiated by its head, Judge Rafael Gutiérrez, continues, or if the creditor contest returns to the Lorenzini court.
Source: Ambito
David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.
