But at the same time, with a distribution per capita for all jurisdictions which in 2022 was $141,175.9, the autonomous city was in the last position with $45,901.6nine times less than Tierra del Fuego.
Beyond the use that can be made of two such opposite variations, both one and the other have an explanation: “The city of Buenos Aires does not participate in the distribution of funds from the special laws, except in a particular case such as taxes to the Fuels destined for Fonavi,” Alejandro Pegoraro, director of the consultancy Politkon Chaco, told Télam.
Consequently, the year-on-year drop in these resources does not generate any impact and “moves linearly with the performance of the co-participation which, as it had a real increase, generates higher increases than the rest of the provinces,” he added.
Resources destined to CABA
From the resolution of conflict around the precautionary measure it will depend the evolution of these in 2023: “if the rate change determined by the Court is applied, throughout the year the district will be the one that grows the most due to a change in the comparative base,” explained Pegoraro, if one takes into account that, in addition to the real evolution that could having the co-participation in general, the increase from 1.40% to 2.95% alone represents an increase of 110.7%.
But apart from this particular dispute, there is a historical difference in the distribution of resources between the provinces of greater and lesser relative developmentderived from the crossing of two criteria: the distributive (which prioritizes the needs of each district) and the devolutive (which puts everyone’s contribution to the global economy first), to which must be added the gaps in terms of population density.
Paradoxically, the two extremes of the distribution of resources per inhabitant are occupied by the districts that did not have autonomy when the Coparticipation Law No. 23,548 was sanctioned: Tierra del Fuego closed 2022 as the most favored province of shipments when measured in terms per capita, with $417,210.5, while CABA (by far the district with the highest population density) was in last place with $45,901.6.
If the complete list is reviewed, it will be possible to observe that in the per capita distribution -with the exception of Chubut- CABA is accompanied among the less favored by the provinces of greater relative development: Santa Fe ($157,174.2), Córdoba ($143,082.8 ), Mendoza ($126,611.9) and Buenos Aires ($82,345.5).
Likewise, Tierra del Fuego is followed in the list by a series of provinces characterized by low population density: Catamarca ($395,162.1), Formosa ($365,751), La Pampa ($321,636.5) and La Rioja ($313,620).
current scheme
The rate of the city of Buenos Aires is calculated outside the so-called “secondary distribution” (distribution among the provinces) and is taken directly from thes resources assigned to the National State.
With the 1.40% rate established in Law 27,606, the city of Buenos Aires is the seventeenth district in terms of percentages, after the province of Buenos Aires, Santa Fe, Córdoba, Chaco, Entre Ríos, Tucumán, Mendoza, Santiago del Estero, Salta, Corrientes, Formosa, San Juan, Misiones, Jujuy, Catamarca and Río Negro.
If the percentage of 2.95 assigned in the precautionary order of the Court prospers, the porteños would become the fourth jurisdiction, only surpassed by Buenos Aires, Santa Fe and Córdoba.
Source: Ambito
David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.
