VW emissions scandal: Diesel owner – resignation from purchase «not just like that»

VW emissions scandal: Diesel owner – resignation from purchase «not just like that»

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) in Karlsruhe has announced the circumstances under which the purchase of a new car can be canceled.

Anyone who has bought a new diesel that has been affected by the VW emissions scandal cannot simply withdraw from the sales contract and demand the money back from the dealer. This was announced by the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) in Karlsruhe on Tuesday for a judgment announced at the end of September.

The case is about a man who – like most of the Diesel plaintiffs – has not sued Volkswagen as a manufacturer for damages. Instead, he wants his car dealer to take back the vehicle he bought shortly before the diesel scandal broke out and to reimburse him for a large part of the purchase price.

In principle, new car buyers have special rights in the first two years if it turns out that their car has defects. Under certain conditions, they usually have the choice between a free repair or an exchange for another, new car. Withdrawal from the purchase contract is only possible if the repair attempts have failed or the dealer refuses to carry out the repair despite being requested to do so.

The plaintiff in the case had given his dealer no deadline, but wanted to get out of the contract immediately. The Cologne courts had considered this to be justified: The man would not be expected to have the inadmissible exhaust technology in the car removed with the software update offered. Ultimately, this comes from the same car manufacturer who caused the defect itself through malicious behavior. In addition, negative effects on the car or driving are conceivable «according to general life experience».

According to the BGH, this should not have been assumed without a detailed examination and expert advice. It is not excluded that the basis of trust between buyer and seller is disturbed here. The highest civil judges, however, point out that, according to their previous jurisprudence, a seller “does not have to accept fraudulent actions by the manufacturer”. In addition, the software update was checked and approved by the responsible authorities at the time in question. The Cologne Higher Regional Court now has to take another closer look at the case after the dealer’s appeal.

Source From: Stern

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Bear rioted in Japanese supermarket

Bear rioted in Japanese supermarket

Video footage shows the bear on the way to the supermarket. The bear almost climbed into the fish freezer. The predator suddenly appeared in the