The work remarked that “in the second semester of 2020, the first purely” pandemic “, the defeminization was due – a priori – to the” Female Employment Effect (EEF) “, which was fundamentally explained by the crisis in two feminized branches: the agencies temporary employment and retail trade.
“In the first case, it is a particular sector in which companies hire workers who later work in other branches of activity. What happened is that the employment hired through these agencies tended to work in the manufacturing industry, more masculinized than the average. In the case of retail trade, feminization was due to the fact that the commercial activities most affected by the pandemic (such as the clothing and footwear trade, which was depressed as a result of the less circulation and less frequency of social gatherings) are relatively more feminized than the commercial average, “they deepened.
Between the second semester of 2020 and the first of 2021, the fall in the feminization rate was due, according to the CEP, mainly to the “Sectoral composition effect” (ECS); due to the fact that the recovery of formal employment – underway since mid-2020 – was more driven by masculinized branches such as industry and construction and, in turn, because the hotel and restaurant sector (one of the most affected by the pandemic , and that it continued to lay off personnel in the first half of 2021) is more feminized than the average.
According to data from the center, between 2007-2019, both the EEF and the ECS promoted feminization, which rose from 30% to 33.5%, although the ECS had a greater influence.
Source From: Ambito
David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.
