Juan Pablo Gallego, Loan parents’ lawyerspoke this morning on Mañana Sylvestre, for Radio 10about the status of the investigation of the minor who has been without information on his whereabouts for 127 days. The lawyer pointed out against the minor’s aunt, Ladeulina Pena and talked about the time of the investigation and Loan’s parents.
Regarding the first days of the investigation, he pointed out that what was done was “to cover up an effective, real and concrete investigation, which we are doing in these 15 daysGallego pointed out that his “only objective in this case” is to find Loan and that “what was done in these 15 days was never done during the first 100 days.”
“There are no more spectacular hypotheses,” he said, in relation to the versions that point to an accident or that the child is in other parts of the country. “I think we are radically changing history, we are doing it without fuss, without so much spectacularity.” The results are beginning to be seen,” he concluded about the investigation.
Juan Pablo Gallego targeted Laudelina Peña, Loan’s aunt
Regarding Laudelina’s role in the case, Gallego pointed out that she “knows, participated, lied and hindered” the investigation. Regarding his desire to testify, and his reversal, he mentioned: “He had stated his willingness to lie again and in the last hours that will declined.”
The judge ordered the aunt’s transfer to a prison in Mendoza. Gallego spoke about how with his team, “We go to the bone, because I’m not interested in politics. Whether the kidnapper was a Techint executive, a rural worker or a politician.”
“Because given this person’s situation, who dedicated himself to bothering, with his nephew’s life at stake“Laudelina is not going to testify for now, she is going to think about it the next lie,” she said about her aunt.
laudelina peña.jpg
He targeted Laudelina Peña, the minor’s child, whom he accused of being in the way of the case.
Courtesy C5N.
Juan Pablo Gallego’s work with Loan’s parents
“I found a court that wants to move forward, that works, that hindered it,” he said about the current work on the case. When asked if he believes in the family’s role in any cover-up, he stated: “Not at all, at least as far as parents are concerned. “I met two desperate parents.”.
“An effective investigation would have had to quickly question everyoneincluding parents, I have no doubt. If you have 8 or 9 people and the little one disappears, how are you going to leave one free for a few more days? Another, if he has a phone, can change it,” he said about the steps to follow. And he continued: “Immediately all these people They should be delayed everyone giving explanations and there you could see who could be accused or who provided truths“.
The lawyer reported that the day before yesterday 10 people were prosecuted for the first time. “There were some boys who had traveled as supposed Samaritans and dedicated themselves to hindering, bothering, impeding the judge’s work. They are already being prosecuted with preventive detention,” he said.
Juan Pablo Gallego’s hypothesis about Loan’s disappearance
“What happened was the abduction of Loan in the sight of 5 or 6 witnesses, in broad daylight,” said the lawyer. And he added that this incident was “in a sector of the field where it was impossible not to see. This is what was left unsaid: it was deliberately overlooked, with the intention of hiding.”
When asked if Loan was handed over to someone from the family unit, he responded: Indeed, I rule out that he was lost, I rule out the accident.”
Source: Ambito