The Minister of Security, Patricia Bullrichhad an interview with “Fat Dan” in which he spoke about the latest two administrations in which he was, he positioned himself regarding what the government of Javier Milei and praised his mandate. Additionally, he answered questions regarding his political vision of today.
Thus, he referred to the differences between having been Mauricio Macri’s minister alongside the PRO, and currently La Libertad Avanza. He maintained that the modification he perceives is that today there is greater “decision and willingness to change”.
“The decision and will to change, the shock…They are changes that are noticeable“said the official when asked what differences she perceives from when she was an official in the Macrista era, holding the same position currently in the libertarian administration.
Patricia Bullrich’s measurements
In this context, the minister revealed that the same anti-picket protocol which he identified as one of the assets to end the street blockades, he had presented it at the beginning of his administration in the Macri government.
“I presented the anti-picket protocol, the same one I presented later. What changed? The decision and the will. When I presented it, Marcos Pena he left and Horacio Rodríguez Larreta Also, they left me alone with the protocol,” he recalled.
Then, he continued: “Three days later I used it because they wanted to take my entrance to the Ezeiza Airport. I sent to the Gendarmeriethere were a couple of rubber bullets, and Marcos Peña called me to tell me ‘you already started with the rubber bullets“They are criticizing us.”
“They took away any possibility of me dedicating myself to the pickets on the 9th of July. and they passed it to Larreta and he did not act. The difference is to change thoroughly instead of going halfway and what others will say,” he concluded between what varied in Macri’s management and what is currently happening.
In this regard, he said that “Macri did many good things, but in other the government’s decision was to be politically correct and that was bad for Argentina because later it came Alberto Fernandez“.
Your opinion about Javier Milei
Regarding the hard conflicts he had with Milei during the 2023 campaign, he said: “I appreciated it and I liked itshared Milei’s ideas, he expressed them in a very strong way, different from mine.”
“After the general selections We hugged Javier and we returned to having the relationship we had. It was the change or the worst of Argentine politics,” he added about the decision he made to support him in the run-off against Sergio Massa.
Returning to the picket lines, Bullrich said that “There was not a single person who believed that it could be finished” with that problem. “I did believe it was possible, in 2015 it wasn’t possible because there was a lack of will,” he insisted.
In turn, he said that the Government project to lower the age of imputability is to take him to 13 years. “We think that’s the age where we see there is little crime, but more than there was before that age.”
“It cannot be that a boy kills and the next day returns home as if nothing had happened. A 13-year-old boy knows perfectly well the difference between killing and not killing.“he added.
Source: Ambito
