Natalia Edith González39, was arrested after kidnapping a baby in a hospital in Paraguay and then try to cross the border to re-enter the country. Now, the prosecutor in the case referred to the issue and confirmed that the woman lied to her relatives, who believed she was going to give birth in Formosa.
“About this lady, Natalia Edith González, originally from Laguna Blanca, all the hypotheses that arose in the first phase were discarded, because She had said that she was in cahoots with the child’s father.which was ruled out,” the prosecutor began her statements Laura Finestra.
Under that framework, he added: “They decreed that He did not do it for extortion purposes or for her to be part of a trafficking network. “We were able to talk with her partner, Iván Paredes, and other family members, and we accessed conversations on her cell phone, which was seized at the time of her arrest,” in dialogue with NA.
The woman lied to her family
He also confirmed: “We verified that she lied to her relatives, she maintained that she was pregnant and that she would travel to the city of Formosa to give birth. At all times she told them that they were in Formosa and crossed into our country on the 14th or 15th.“.
“At the moment, we have no record because her entry into the country was clandestine, but since the 15th she was sending photographs from another hospital,” he explained, and then explained that “her partner was stunned when I posted it.” aware of the situation.” The man stayed in Laguna Blanca “in charge of the two minor creatures.” And he added: “A criminal figure would be created that in our legislation is called violation of parental authority.”
“We want call the husband to testify and also do a psychological examination and a medical inspectionbecause we don’t know if she could have lost a baby, which led her to this emotional state that made her do what she did,” Finestra confirmed.
Also, he maintained: “But as I tell you, she chose the victim at randomvisited two other public hospitals before and took advantage of the vulnerability of the controls and that is how he had access to the mother who was alone at that time and stole the child.
After the hearing, the judge will determine what precautionary measure they will give you.
Regarding the accusation of the woman, he explained: “We accuse her of violation of parental authority and this derives from the criminal judge of guarantees who is the one who determines whether she will have preventive detention or some other less burdensome measure, but They have not yet taken the hearing. In the course of the afternoon they are going to take the hearing and the judge is going to determine what precautionary measure they are going to give him.”
On the other hand, he explained: “She can testify at any time during the investigation before the Public Ministry. This hearing before the judge is rather to study all the aspects that have to do with her roots, with the danger of flight, the expectation of sentence and all the factors that are decisive for granting alternative measures or preventive detention. On the recommendation of her defender, she refrained from testifying.
Finally, after being asked how she saw González, she answered: “She was calm, she insisted on giving contradictory versions, so her defender recommended that she abstain, they were all implausible. In her eagerness to justify herself she involved other people but that was distorted.”
Source: Ambito
