Taxpayers still have a chance to regularize assets before the Customs Collection and Control Agency (ARK) During the third stage he expires on May 7 Without paying the special tax.
And it maintains its validity the non -taxable minimum of US $ 100,000 . That is, that someone who enters now and until May and has a well recorded lower than that value can be launder at zero cost, although the aliquot is 15%.
If you get to overcome that amount, Then he will pay 15% for the difference with the value of the property as of December 31, 2023. Actually, it is more likely that a person declares for these amounts an account abroad that is at risk of being informed by the IRS of the United States or within the framework of the OECD multilateral agreement.
It is likely that the figure of that account is lower. If it is superior, it will only pay for the difference, since it is a non -taxable minimum.
This does not run in case the person has Made statements of goods in stages 1 and 2. If it exceeds the amount of the franchise you will have to pay 15% for everything. In the case of cash was different: the US $ 100,000 was an exempt minimum, so everything that exceeded that figure paid the 5% tax for the entire amount.
The reality is that For the Government the money laundering has already fulfilled its function. He got thousands of Argentines to get small amounts under the mattress and put them in the banks.
With that, it was able to increase the deposits in dollars to about US $ 15,000 million in less than a month, which resulted in an increase in International reservations (travel) of about US $ 5,000 millions. This explains almost half of the reserves that the Central Bank could gather in a year, since the arrival of the new government.
Regularization of the taxpayer and his family group
The bleaching establishes qEU in the case of regularization made by the taxpayer and by their family group all the subjects they regularize, proportionally, the US $ 100,000 franchise.
Such an assumption that would apply when the regularizes taxpayer is in charge of any of the indicated relatives and they also adhere to the regime.
This means that Each that bleaches must determine the special tax separately, considering the US $ 100,000 franchise, to the extent that the deposit does not exceed such amount.
But in this sense, the term in charge must be clarified, it is understood as a relative in charge of those to whom the taxpayer who regularizes holds, totally or partially, from the economic point of view and to the extent that his total annual income is not higher than $ 451,000.
Source: Ambito
