Russia and China assured support on the IMF board, but the US is needed

Russia and China assured support on the IMF board, but the US is needed

According to official calculations, Argentina would now have guaranteed global support of 70% in the directory. This level is reached by guaranteeing Germany, France, Spain and other European countries would vote in favor of the country, adding other key states that, it is ruled out, would also endorse Argentina. Russia and China are mentioned in this group, adding the Arab countries (especially those of the Persian Gulf, with a strong presence on the IMF board), as well as, logically, all of Latin America and Africa. It is also hoped that more consensus would be achieved with key countries such as Canada and the rest of the European Union, with which the percentage would rise to about 70%. Thus, it would be necessary to obtain only 10% more for the essential level so that a proposal that transgresses what the IMF statutes mandate and dictate can be approved.

Only with a minimum of 85% of the guarantees could the Fund’s line technicians be authorized to apply a payment plan for the country outside of the only mechanisms authorized by the organization’s charter: standby and Extended Facilities , both in all possible variables. Since what the country is proposing is an alteration of the norms, only a vote of more than 85% could endorse the request.

With this, sooner or later, Alberto Fernández will have to resolve face to face (via video call) with Joe Biden, the support of the United States on the board. This country holds 16.74% of the shares, so without this guarantee it would be impossible for the intention to (slightly) alter the IMF Organic Charter to be possible. And this is necessary, since from what is known, the Extended Facilities that are being discussed would have alterations with respect to what is written in the internal regulations of the organization, and only with the support of the maximum board could these changes be reconfigured. More taking into account that before the close experience of the last IMF negotiators (Alejandro Werner, Roberto Cardarelli and company), who after signing a Stand By outside the statutes, ended up ejected from their positions.

In conclusion, and following a maxim of “Albertismo”, “With the United States it is not enough, but without the United States it is not possible”. According to the numbers that are made in the Palacio de Hacienda, if a call from Alberto Fernández achieved this support, the country would already exceed the 85% necessary and would reach almost 90% of the votes. The only thing left in doubt would be what Japan (6% of the votes), the Nordic countries (3.43%) and other European states would do, traditionally reluctant to support the country (they did not do so in Macri’s time either).

On the topic of board votes, the situation is clearly marked. Each sovereign state has a percentage of votes depending on its GDP; reservations and direct contributions to the operation of the organization based in Washington. Any normal agreement (stand by or Extended Facilities) is approved with a minimum percentage of 70%; but a majority of 85% is needed for special plans or changes to the Organic Charter. Recently, this majority was necessary in cases such as the Greek crisis of 2010 and that of Portugal in 2011.

The need to achieve that percentage was what played against Argentina in 2001, when the last disbursement committed in the current agreement was disapproved in the board of directors due to the refusal of the United States to endorse the proposal (on the direct recommendation of the number two of those years, Anne Krueger); as well as the approval of the pact of 2003 when Néstor Kirchner negotiated directly with George Bush a quota plan outside the existing treaties.

In the current case, it is also essential that the North American director endorse the request, since his vote for or against (or his abstention) will define the fate of the Argentine proposal. In total, the board is made up of 24 executive directors who represent different percentage levels of power within the organization. The United States, Japan, Germany, France and the United Kingdom can choose a director without help from any other country. China, Saudi Arabia and Russia de facto elect one director each; while the remaining 16 choose it according to blocks of states. Argentina, through the local envoy, Sergio Chodos, occupies the group with Bolivia, Chile, Peru, Paraguay and Uruguay.

Source: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts