I wonder if we would not be better with Lilia Lemoine

I wonder if we would not be better with Lilia Lemoine

Who was one of the president’s main economic advisors before assuming, questioned one of the central axes of government policy, the fiscal surplus.

President Javier Milei’s ex -analysis, Carlos Rodríguez, fulminated the Minister of Economy this Friday Luis Caputo. He accused him of “Make up” the fiscal deficit And he asked with irony: “We would not be better with (the national deputy Lilia) Lemoine makeup the deficit and caputo makeup Milei

In his direct and ironic style, the economist fulminated Caputo in his social networks. “There are two fundamental people in this Government: 1- Lilia Lemoine, who put on Milei so that the pater is not noticed. 2- Luis Caputo, that makeup the public accounts so that the deficit is not noticed”, He said, sowing the terrain for the auction.

The criticism is hard, because it is one of the central axes of the government’s economic policy. The fiscal surplus that celebrates freedom progresses is essential because it would allow it not to emit pesos, which, always according to its story, not generate inflation due to excess circulating weights. For Rodríguez there is no fiscal surplus.

Embed – https://publish.twitter.com/Oembed?url=https://x.com/carod2015/status/1908206806217756944&partner=&hide_thread=false

Shortly after the first post in X, Rodríguez put the auction of his comment. “I wonder if we would not be better with lemoine makeup the deficit and caputo makeup it to Milei“He said laughs and emojis.

The Government doubled in March the discretionary funds to the provinces

Discretionary funds of the national government to the provinces registered in March a strong increase of 224%, According to official data from the Ministry of Economy. There were $ 283,396 million for 24 jurisdictions.

While the figure looks important, strict Supreme Court in favor of the City of Buenos Aires for the claim of its percentage of federal co -participation.

“In March, the provinces received $ 283,396 million and $ 176,152 million if compliance with precautionary measure CSJN 1864/2022 (CABA) is excluded. In the latter case it implies a nominal year -on -year rise of 210.1% and a real rise of 101.3%,” said the headline of the head of the head Argentine Institute of Fiscal Analysis (Iaraf), Nadin Argañaraz.

The economist clarifies that “if accrued expense is considered (without court failure) a nominal rise of 32.8% and a real drop of 13.8% were observed.”

Source: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts