The Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit for the paternity of Sandro

The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation He ended the demand that a woman had filed to be recognized as Biological daughter of the famous singer Roberto Sánchezknown as Sandrodeceased in January 2010.

With the signing of the judges Horacio Rosatti, Carlos Rosenkrantz and Ricardo Lorenzettithe highest court considered inadmissible, through Article 280 of the Nation Civil and Commercial Procedural Codethe presentation of the woman.

The cause

The case began when Sandra Edit Borda interposed an action of challenge of affiliation with respect to Carlos Borda and, in the same act, an action of recognition of affiliation against Roberto Sánchez. The woman said she learned that she was the singer’s daughter in 2006 When his mother confessed before he died.

In 2007an examination of DNA next to the artist extrajudicially. Sandro’s alleged daughter said that the singer’s couple informed her that the result had given negative, but said the study saw.

The woman went to justice. As detailed in the judicial presentation, in the year 1965 His mother met Roberto Sánchez and began a hidden relationship that lasted several years. Some time later his mother met Carlos Bordawith whom he married.

However, the meetings with the singer continued. In 2014Sandra obtained the challenge of the paternity of Carlos Bordawho raised her as her natural daughter.

Negative DNA

In 2015 Sandro’s remains were exhumed To perform a DNA test. The exam gave negative.

“The observed results are incompatible with the existence of a father/daughter bond“, says the first instance ruling where the demand was rejected. The Chamber confirmed the resolutionby establishing that the test was categorical regarding the genetic incompatibility Between the woman and Roberto Sánchez.

Against the decision, the plaintiff appealed the sentence through a Resource for nullity and inapplicability of the law.

In February 2024the Supreme Court of Justice of the Province of Buenos Aires rejected the demand. For the magistrates Luis Esteban Genoud, Daniel Fernando Soria, Sergio Gabriel Torres and Hilda Koganthe grievances brought to the extraordinary instance were linked to an issue addressed by the previous courts, although in an unfavorable sense to the plaintiff and therefore only the legal success of the ruling.

As stood out, the DNA expert test In both tests it had been overwhelming At the end that it was the same person and that There was no biological bond Between the plaintiff and the deceased, of which the appellant was disregarded and failed to refute it, not being sufficient to state the existence of arbitrariness if it is not demonstrated that the intellectual operation developed in the formation of the sentence lacks acceptable bases.

The woman then arrived with a Extraordinary appeal in complaint before the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, where he insisted with his approach. He Maximum court rejected the presentation by inadmissible.