A viral scene aboard an airplane shot online attacks, and now the passenger points against the airline for not stopping harassment.
Millions of people consume viral content Every day, but rarely imagine the real consequences for those who become protagonists. What begins as a scene in Tiktok It can climb to the point of transforming careers, public identities and even leading to legal conflicts with large companies.
That was what happened with Jeniffer Castroa young Brazilian who jumped to fame without looking for him, when refusing to change his seat on a flight. His decision became a Online scandal that changed his life completely and ended in court.
He did not want to give a child’s seat and went viral: what happened to Jeniffer
It all started on a flight of The goal airlinewhere Jeniffer, with his pre -assigned seat next to the window, refused to give the place to a child. Although the child’s family also had a reserved similar seat, they insisted on change. The refusal unleashed an immediate reaction: Another passenger the recorded No consent and shared the moment in networks.
The video went viral, generating thousands of comments and attacks. Some users accused her of selfish, others insulted her and even questioned her state of health. Jeniffer faced a flood of judgments without the possibility of defending himself in real time.
Following the scandal, his mental health deteriorated. For weeks he avoided leaving his home. Professionally, he left his previous work and channeled media attention towards a new facet as influencerwhere now it brings together more than two million of followers and multiple advertising contracts.
Beyond the change of life, the situation opened a debate: to what can a person be exposed by a private decision within a public space? And what responsibility does companies have in the face of these episodes?
Jennifer sued the airline and the passenger who filmed her without her consent
Faced with the consequences of the video, the young woman decided to advance legally. Started one demand against the airline Goal for not intervening in the situation and allowing dissemination without content control. He also operated against the person who recorded it without authorization.
Although the amount of the claim did not transcend, the young woman explained that the objective of her judicial presentation is to avoid new public humiliations such as the one she suffered. In his words, his case is not just about money, but to sit precedents against digital lynching.
Source: Ambito
I am an author and journalist who has worked in the entertainment industry for over a decade. I currently work as a news editor at a major news website, and my focus is on covering the latest trends in entertainment. I also write occasional pieces for other outlets, and have authored two books about the entertainment industry.
