Hard live cross between Analía Franchín and Nancy Pazos

And he added: “She -by Franchín- is a person, like there are many in Argentina, who have not yet lifted the veil and almost see feminists as ‘I do not want to have anything to do with you because I like to be the kept woman. Analía works, but she has a husband who takes her on a private plane. So, from there, sustaining the system is fundamental. I say yes two or three times, I see how I do such a thing, and I am unsuccessful”.

Analía’s response was immediate and this morning, just starting the program that leads Florence Pena on phone, asked for a moment to make his release, which took everyone in the study by surprise. “I listen to Nancy talk about Women’s Day and I think it’s good today to highlight the achievements that women want to make and not put on a mask of feminism when in reality, what we do is preach machismo,” she began.

And he continued: “I say this because yesterday, Nancy Pazos, you tarnished my father’s honor, my mother’s ability to say no. My mother, who is 84 years old, is an elderly lady who sleeps with my father’s ashes on her bedside table, they were married for 40 years. My mother, who had to leave her parental home from a very young age, precisely to avoid abuse. So, it seems to me that it is sexist precisely to break the honor of a woman, her courage, to think that I can only have sex because my husband has money. And also, even discriminatory for women who do not have a husband with money. Not being able to believe that women enjoy sexuality regardless of the man next to us, seems terrible and sexist to me.

In this sense, he revealed his colleague’s alleged complaint against Noelia Antonelli, the journalist who also works with them in that cycle. “Feminism, for me, does not question ability and talent. When you call a producer to complain that Noelia presents the report of the war, it is sexist, because you are questioning her ability, her talent and what breaks the c … working all the days. Needless to say, a lot of things seem sexist to me.”

And he pointed directly at him again: “Perhaps your experience with men in life has not been good, but I had and have splendid men in life. My dad was a great man, there is still no person who has tarnished his honor. I understand that you tried, you did not succeed. My husband and children are beautiful men.” “I would never mess with your husband or your ex, or your children, much less your father. If being sexist is being a rapist, you are a serial rapist”closed forcefully.

Despite the fact that Franchín did not want to continue with the subject, the driver gave the floor to Nancy, who also stated her position and criticized her partner for making these differences between the two public. “It goes without saying that I send a kiss to your mother and that I did not mean to offend her. I spoke in general and took it as an example, because you gave it as an example at that time,” Pazos said. And he clarified: “I did not complain to a producer because Noelia presented a note, I simply said ‘what place remains for me, if what is current, which is mine, is presented by Noelia who does show things?’ ”.

“Simply what I said was, that obviously it is very difficult on a day like today, to explain to people who have not lifted the veil… What’s more, I even put it as a personal example. I told that at one time in my life, when I was a journalist and I was very young, I had to cover in the Chamber of Deputies the moment in which the quota law was being debated in Argentina, and I myself, who was a girl Young, I did not fully understand why that law was needed (…) I needed to grow up and things would happen to me,” Pazos said.

And he replied referring to his family: “I have had divine men in my life, I have three divine children too. It is not personal. I adore men, I love them. But the concrete thing is that the system is patriarchal. I told it until one day that I went to cut off the relationship with an ex-partner, that I never reported it because it was not what was seen at that time.

Meanwhile, he explained what he meant in the note they made to him in Intruders. “When they asked me about you, that I have known you for many years, I said that when you first arrived I raised certain objections because we had a very different past, of which you clearly have to take care that you even spoke of my own children. To make it clear, because if not here it seems that there was only one victim, ”she reproached him, although Franchín flatly denied it. But Pazos assured: “You talked about how they could take custody of my children from me.”

“I felt attacked many times in that program -she said referring to LAM, a program of which both were part- and I came out of a climate of absolute work toxicity, of which you were part. I did not want to recreate this here and in everything, until now, we always had a good relationship, “he continued while Analía reproached him for having referred to her intimacy with her husband. “Beyond that, what I explain many times and I took you as an example, because what I say in public I say in private, I have no difference of opinion,” said Pazos. At that time, Analía accused her of believing herself superior to her. But the journalist emphasized again: “It is much more difficult to remove the veil from a situation that is generalized when your situation is privileged. I do not underestimate, what I do is explain positions. I don’t think you’re stupid, you’re smart and your privileged situation means that you don’t feel so attacked by that machismo.

However, the panelist reproached him: “You have no idea about my life. You have no idea what I fight in court for machismo, for my niece, for alleged child abuse. You talk from the mouth out because you are blinded, obsessed. Run away from me, look at something else. Don’t be superior.”