Amber Heard questioned about missing donations – and repeated contradiction

Amber Heard questioned about missing donations – and repeated contradiction

In the large-scale interview with the “Today Show”, Amber Heard once again has to comment on the donations that she promised but did not pay. The missing funds were part of Johnny Depp’s defense in court – much to Heard’s chagrin.

Amber Heard’s first major interview following her and ex-husband Johnny Depp’s defamation trial is eagerly awaited. And the first statements by the actress that were published in advance are already attracting attention.

In a conversation with “Today Show” presenter Samantha Guthrie, Heard repeated her allegations that Depp had hit her. She also reveals that she still loves him. In addition, she complains that the jury was influenced by the hate wave on social networks.

Amber Heard comments on the lack of donations

But Guthrie also addressed the “Aquaman” actress in the interview about a new finding of the process: the fact that Amber Heard did not donate the seven million dollars from the divorce settlement with Johnny Depp in full as promised. $3.5 million would go to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). But in court, the organization’s Chief Operating Officer testified that only 1.3 million had been donated. $350,000 from Amber Heard, $100,000 from Johnny Depp, $350,000 from a fund, and $500,000 from a fund owned by Elon Musk.

Heard now explains in an interview that she made a promise and wants to continue to honor the promise. Guthrie then wants to know if Heard lied on the witness stand and the jury caught her. “I don’t know. I feel like a lot of the process was about questioning who I was, my credibility and making myself out to be a liar in every way possible,” Heard replies.

She also emphasizes that she cannot be accused of not having donated the entire amount immediately because that was not the purpose of the promise.

Contradictions on the witness stand

On the witness stand, Amber Heard revealed for the first time that she hadn’t donated all of the money, citing that Depp had sued her. But the actor’s lawyers argued that Heard had a year before her ex-husband sued. The problem: Both in the British court case and on a Dutch television show, she claimed to have already donated all the money.

As on the witness stand, Heard talks about “promises” and “donations” in the interview as if the terms mean one and the same thing. In the first interview after the end of the trial, she does not reveal why she emphasized in court in London and on the talk show that she had donated the entire sum, although that was not actually true. Heard should not invalidate the arguments of her critics.

Source used:

Source: Stern

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts