24hoursworld

British royals: Prince Harry shakes the foundations of the monarchy

British royals: Prince Harry shakes the foundations of the monarchy

The British royal family has made it into the 21st century through a unique relationship with the public. Prince Harry wants to break up with this model.

If there was ever any doubt as to whether British royals read tabloid reports about themselves, Prince Harry’s autobiography has dispelled it. Not only do they read them, but as informants they are often behind them themselves, at least if the 38-year-old is to be believed.

Ahead of the official release of the book, dubbed “Spare,” on Tuesday, Prince Harry has revealed his motives for an unprecedented display of the inner workings of the British royal family in several television interviews in the UK and US.

As has gradually become clear since last week, he doesn’t mince his words in the book, which accidentally ended up in Spanish bookstores last Thursday. He describes experiences, arguments and feelings in an unprecedented level of detail. These include a recent physical attack by his brother William (40), mixed emotions towards his stepmother Camilla (75) and his own experiences with sex and drugs and killing Taliban fighters as a soldier in Afghanistan.

Negative headlines have been launched

The family motto “never complain, never explain”, according to which the royals don’t care about the content of the gossip press, was just a loose phrase, says Harry in an interview with the British broadcaster ITV, das aired on Sunday. In reality there was “a lot of complaining and a lot of explaining”. But that always happened underhand.

But he goes much further. Many negative headlines about him and his wife Meghan (41) were launched from the palace to make other members of the family appear in a better light. Harry usually leaves it open who, in his opinion, was behind this in individual cases. But one person keeps getting targeted: his stepmother, king consort Camilla.

In another interview with the US broadcaster CBS, Harry accuses her of having acted as a “villain” in the love triangle between her, King Charles III. (74) and Harry’s mother Diana felt the need to polish her image in public. She achieved this by “sacrificing him on the altar of her personal public relations work”. Speaking to ITV, he says certain members of the family have “decided to go to bed with the devil” to improve their image.

The early trauma of losing a mother

Prince Harry paints a picture of a monarchy that sees its own survival as inextricably linked to public opinion and therefore to coverage in Britain’s powerful tabloid press. The royals and their advisors are therefore obsessed with influencing the headlines. Even if it means spreading lies about your family.

What drives him, it becomes clear again and again, is the trauma of the early loss of his mother Princess Diana, whose car crashed in 1997 while fleeing paparazzi in a Paris tunnel.

However, he sees his current campaign not only as a personal “mission”, but as part of a global fight against racism and misogyny. These were also directed against his wife Meghan by the tabloid press. He largely protects the royals with this accusation. He emphasizes that it was not racism that he and his wife Meghan accused the family of in an interview with US talk show legend Oprah Winfrey broadcast in March 2021 when it came to speculation about the skin color of their unborn children, but unconscious prejudice .

Prince Harry also feeds the monster

The difference is important because you can free yourself from these unconscious biases whoever you want, Harry said. But there were just as few signs of that as of a reconciliation with him. But it is important to him, he makes it clear again and again: “I want my father back, I want my brother back,” Harry almost begs in the ITV interview. But there was only a deafening silence from the palace.

Harry will find it difficult to dispel one accusation: that he is with the book and the six-part Netflix documentary and that he is monetizing his family’s private life and has only exchanged the pact with the media in Great Britain for a new one. “I totally accept that writing the book means feeding the monster,” he said in an interview with ABC published on Monday.

Source: Stern

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts