Silvina Luna case: they rejected another arrest request against Anibal Lotocki

Silvina Luna case: they rejected another arrest request against Anibal Lotocki

The Oral Criminal and Correctional Court 28, which sentenced the doctor Aníbal Lotocki for serious injuries to four patients, including Silvina Lunatoday refused to grant the arrest requests that the prosecutor had made against him Sandro Abraldes and the lawsuit led by Fernando Burlando.

The decision was reflected in a single ruling by the judge who highlighted that Lotocki was always within the law and that he is currently sentenced to 4 years of imprisonment “subject to the sentence becoming final, which until now has not happened.”

On September 13, Fernando Burlando, lawyer for Silvina Luna’s family, also requested the arrest of Lotocki “due to the complexity that the procedural situation has gained” for the doctor.but that request had not been resolved.

Other requests for Lotocki’s arrest were rejected

Another request was made by the attorney general Sandro Abraldes on the claims of the complaints Pamela Sosaalso sponsored by Burlando; Gabriela Trenchiadvised by Nuria Drendakand Stefanía Xipolitakiswith the legal representation of the lawyers Gonzalo Díaz Canton and Agustín Mariano Maya.

“Lotocki was always within the law, every time he was told to attend the Court he did so. He has a registered domicile and through his lawyers he has been permanently in contact with the Court. When he was authorized to leave the country, He always returned and was right,” the judge said in the ruling to which Télam agreed.

“Circumstances that have no impact on Lotocki’s situation in this process were also invoked as arguments to revoke his freedom. The unfortunate death of Silvina Luna motivated the formation of another criminal complaint, corresponding to the Magistrate who intervenes in that event, to issue a ruling on if such circumstance affects the freedom of movement of the accused,” he said.

“The existence of other complaints against him cannot alter the content of the sentence that I opportunely handed down with respect to the named person. There are other facts, with other judges in charge of the investigation and, where appropriate, they are the ones who must decide about the restriction on Lotocki’s freedom,” argued the magistrate.

“Finally, a comfortable economic situation is also referred to, which includes the possibility of traveling outside the country, but this is not a budget to imprison him either,” said Rengel Mirat in his 3-page ruling.

Yesterday, the National Criminal and Correctional Court 60 rejected another request for the arrest of Lotocki in the case followed by the Uruguayan actor and producer Raphael Dufortwho suffered serious health problems after undergoing surgery at his clinic, judicial sources reported.

Judge Edmundo Rabbione decided to “not grant” the request made by the prosecutor Lucio Herrera and by the complainant because “the seriousness of the complaint and the accusations made require being extremely rigorous in the collection and evaluation of the evidence, before making the very serious determination of ordering an arrest.”

On September 13, Fernando Burlandofamily lawyer Silvina Lunaalso requested the arrest of Lotocki “due to the complexity that the procedural situation” of the doctor has gained, but that request has not been resolved yet.

Source: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts