The trial is actually about the police protection that Prince Harry and his family receive in Great Britain. But his lawyer also reveals a different view of the move to the USA than the royal family.
In his legal dispute over police protection in Great Britain, Prince Harry portrayed his move to the USA as by no means a free decision. He does not agree with the claim that he has decided to no longer be a “working member” of the royal family, his lawyer Shaheed Fatima told the London High Court on Thursday.
Rather, to their “great sadness, he and his wife Meghan felt forced to step down from this role and leave the country in 2020,” the 39-year-old prince assured in a statement read by his lawyer.
“Britain is my home,” said the youngest son of King Charles III. continued in the statement. He wants his children to feel just as comfortable there as they do in their current place of residence in the USA. But that won’t work “if it is not possible to protect them on British soil.”
Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan in the USA
Harry and his wife Meghan retired from royal duties in April 2020 and now live in California with their two young children. As a result, the two lost their taxpayer-funded police protection in Great Britain. The British Home Office subsequently refused to assign police officers to ensure his security during visits to Harry’s home country, even though the prince himself wanted to cover the costs of the deployment.
Invictus Games
Look, we’re in love: Meghan and Harry are flirting and getting up close and personal with the fans
The new proceedings before the High Court, which began on Tuesday, specifically concern the Interior Ministry’s decision made in February 2020 to only grant Prince Harry police protection on a case-by-case basis.
Trial for personal protection for Harry’s family
Lawyer James Eadie, who represents the Home Office in the process, defended the limited protection promise. The fact that Prince Harry only receives police protection under “certain conditions” and “depending on the context” is due to the “change in his status” that the prince himself brought about with the decision to become “a member of the royal family without an official function.” .
Source: Stern
I am an author and journalist who has worked in the entertainment industry for over a decade. I currently work as a news editor at a major news website, and my focus is on covering the latest trends in entertainment. I also write occasional pieces for other outlets, and have authored two books about the entertainment industry.
