Former Big Brother Griselda Sánchez ratified the complaint of sexual abuse against Fabián Gianola

Former Big Brother Griselda Sánchez ratified the complaint of sexual abuse against Fabián Gianola

In that sense, Sánchez said that the actor appeared in his underwear in front of her and spoke of a “humiliating flannel” while now the prosecution must determine if there are elements of suspicion to promote the new complaint or not.

At the time, Judge Ángeles Gómez Maiorano ruled the lack of merit of Fabián Gianola before the complaints of Fernanda Meneses and Viviana Aguirre.

Both pointed out different situations and the first one even referred to a sexual abuse with carnal access dating from 2011, but for Justice there is not enough evidence and now it will be the Crime Chamber that establishes whether the situation is reversed or not.

On the other hand, in recent days, the actor was benefited with the lack of merit by Judge Ángeles Mariana Gómez Maiorano, who did not find elements to prosecute him for the two accusations of sexual abuse made by two co-workers.

“From a meticulous and careful analysis of the records that have been produced and incorporated in the proceedings throughout this instruction, it is noted that the factual framework collected to date is not capable of determining -with the degree of probability required by this procedural instance – the materiality of the events under study, “said the judge last Friday.

In a 46-page ruling, the magistrate reviewed one by one the facts reproached against Gianola and the evidence gathered in the investigation, to reach the conclusion that she does not have sufficient evidence to prosecute him, but not to dissociate him.

“It is premature to adopt a temperament that definitively disassociates the defendant from these actions, since prior to ordering any type of conclusive resolution that could put an end to his submission to the process, I consider it essential to expand the procedures carried out, suggesting that the Fiscal Unit for Crimes of Violence Against Women “, the magistrate decided.

In this sense, it ordered “the realization of a series of suitable expertises to perfect the evidentiary framework and thus arrive at the clarification of the facts under investigation.”

Source From: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts