“With the complaint, with the coming to light of this family matter of the former president, it has triggered not only in me, but also in the vast majority of my colleagues, the enormous displeasure that we have with Alberto Fernández’s management,” he said.
“We Peronists are quite organic and we criticize behind closed doors, especially in times of construction and so as not to give the adversary any credit. And especially in times like these, which trigger such an aberrant situation, we not only repudiate and repudiate on a personal level, but I take the opportunity to say how shitty Alberto’s government was, with its timid and conservative decisions,” said the actor in conversation with Futurock.
He also added: “The complaint is the icing on the cake. I don’t know if Alberto Fernández’s administration was deliberate, or if it was the mole that was introduced into a certain system to make it collapse.In fact, he boasted of being the only one who said ‘no’ to the vice president and of putting his confrontation with Cristina Kirchner first as a valuable fact.”
Echarri did not hold back and said that he is “disgusted” by everything he has learned about the former president: “This is an intimate story, although not the same as what is being revealed now, but when he took office we gave him a nod and said ‘Alberto, you were so important in the management of intellectual property rights, so all this is here to move forward’.”
“And we clearly knew that Alberto was not a promoter of rights adjustments, and that, paraphrasing Guillermo Moreno, he had a more social-democratic outlook, so to speak, and well, we confirmed this over time. And this only raises the bar of disgust, where I no longer even hold back from saying the things I say. Until now there was a certain cloak of pity over the character, but with what happened, that cloak of pity flies through the air,” he continued.
Pablo Echarri on the election of Alberto Fernández as a candidate
“The former president’s ideas were those, he was not the Peronist we all wanted to see. If one thinks that Kirchnerism could be the representative of what the doctrine of Perón and Evita was, of the adjustment of rights, of reducing the social gap, of thinking about the workers, there are already three elections in which Kirchnerism cannot put forward a candidate of its own, because they do not have enough voting prospects to be able to win,” said Echarri.
He also stressed: “Even the candidates Cristina anointed were Peronists who leaned more towards the centre. Not so much towards the left, like the 12 years of Kirchnerism when progress was made in terms of rights in a rapid and concrete way.”
Echarri later said: “We knew what was coming, we had hope, We pretend to be a bit crazy when it comes to voting. We are pragmatic, but we know who we are facing. and we knew it wasn’t the best option. We were expressing it privately and now we are expressing it publicly.”
“I am not a popularizer, I am not dedicated to evangelizing people. That is the issue, I am not obliged to disclose or say this before. And if I want to, I won’t say it afterwards, but this goes hand in hand with the reason why I expressed myself politically years ago. It is unstoppable for me, I would dry up if I could not say this and my existence would cease to have the same value. My only objective in politics is to beat the right,” he concluded.
Source: Ambito
I am an author and journalist who has worked in the entertainment industry for over a decade. I currently work as a news editor at a major news website, and my focus is on covering the latest trends in entertainment. I also write occasional pieces for other outlets, and have authored two books about the entertainment industry.
