The Justice denied the request to the AFA and the IGJ will define whether the elections are brought forward or not

The Justice denied the request to the AFA and the IGJ will define whether the elections are brought forward or not

October 14, 2024 – 18:29

Talleres de Córdoba seeks to prevent the assembly in which Tapia will be re-elected for the second time from being brought forward, which should be held next year.

Justice denied the Argentine Football Association (AFA) the request to advance the elections one year earlier than what the Statute establishes and it will be the General Inspection of Justice (IGJ) who will have the last word in the dispute between the current leadership of Claudio “Chiqui” Tapia and Córdoba workshops.

In this regard, the Minister of Justice, Mariano Cúneo Libarona frame: “The Justice Department rejected the precautionary measure presented by the AFA and it will be the IGJ who decides whether or not the elections are held.”

The claim of Talleres de Córdoba about the elections in AFA

From the Cordoba club they had indicated that “There is no reason to advance the elections a year when all directors have a current mandate; The call was made abruptly and without notice to the clubs with sufficient advance notice; “This prevented the members from being able to try to put together lists of candidates with enough time, and carry out an electoral campaign.”

Along these lines, they maintained that “in a preventive and prior to a ruling from the IGJ being issued on the matterthe AFA asked the court that the elections be held in any case beyond what the IGJ establishes and that the validity of the electoral process be discussed with the elections already consummated.”

The club that leads the now suspended Andres Fassi seeks to avoid the assembly on October 17 where Tapia will renew his mandate after only one list (his) was presented.

The release of Cúneo Libarona

Now Justice denied AFA’s request, and Cúneo Libarona reported: ““The judge considered that since there has not yet been a resolution from the IGJ, it is not up to the court to grant the requested precautionary measure.”

Along these lines, the minister stated that “The final decision rests with the IGJ, since it is the body that controls the AFA and other entities.”

“The AFA is swatting because they know that what they are doing is not allowed.”“concluded the head of the Justice portfolio.

Source: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts