Cristina Kirchner: “Milei could not pass the chainsaw to the AUH but, given the economic disaster, he had to duplicate it”

The former president, Cristina Fernández de Kirchnerused his social networks to cross President Javier Milei again, in the middle of the campaign for the presidency of the Justicialista Party, and to commemorate the 15 years of the launch of the Universal Child Allowance. “Milei’s government not only could not pass the chainsaw to him but, in the face of the economic and social disaster that it is causing with its policies, had to double it compared to the amount they charge formal workers per child,” he analyzed.

The state policy was released on October 29, 2009and provides for a monthly sum that is paid for each child under 18 years of age who belongs to a family group without work or who works in the informal economy. In her message Cristina Kirchner assured that this decision: “allowed the children of informal or unemployed workers, had the same economic recognition as the children of formal workers“.

Cristina Kirchner claimed the Universal Child Allowance

Through her personal X account, the former president published a text in which commemorated the launch of the Universal Child Allowance. In addition, the leader of Peronism also took advantage of the occasion to outline her criticism of the economic direction of the ruling party.

“Today, October 29, marks 15 years since the announcement and implementation of the Universal Child Allowance (AUH), that allowed the children of informal or unemployed workers to have the same economic recognition as the children of formal workers“, began a text shared by Cristina Kirchner.

In her message, the former president highlighted that “as it is a remuneration of a universal nature and complementary to the world of registered work,” it “It constituted a social policy recognized at a global level not only by result, but by way of implementation.: without intermediaries and directly to each boy and girl up to the age of 18.”

“This social policy instrument has been so important for vulnerable sectors, that Milei’s government not only could not give him the chainsaw but, before the economic and social disaster what he is causing with his policies, had to double it compared to the amount that formal workers charge per childthus disengaging it from a virtuous system of promoting work and giving rise to a new inequality,” he then fired at Javier Milei’s measures in reference to this policy.

Finally, Cristina Kirchner concluded: “The enormous difference between today and 15 years ago is that at that time the registered workers in the first salary bracket that They received the same amount of child allowance as the AUH, THEY WERE NOT POOR. Let them tell it how they want.”.

Ricardo Quintela presented a precautionary measure to be able to compete in the internal PJ

Cristina Kirchner’s message arrives in the midst of a tense climate in Peronism. Yesterday, the representatives of the list headed by the governor of La Rioja, Ricardo Quintela, They presented a precautionary measure in the Federal Justice with the aim thatenable your candidacy to compete internally of the Justicialist Party (PJ).

The appeal contains the signatures of Jorge Raúl Yoma, Daniel Hugo Lleramnos and Sandra Inés Vanni, representatives of the “Federals a cry from the heart” list and opposes Resolution No. 6 of that Board, dated October 24, 2024 – notification on the official website – with the purpose of its elevation to the Federal Court with Electoral competitionin accordance with the factual and legal considerations that we set out below. Regarding this, the text rejects “the challenge raised; and the appeal for reconsideration deduced because the decision was found to be in accordance with the law and the subsidiary appeal was not granted.

“Do not suspend the course of this electoral process, and must continue it according to its status; Fourth: Do not make the list “Federals, a cry from the heart” official because it does not meet the regulatory requirements”, among others.

In this way, the space led by the Riojan demands that the Resolution cited for being manifestly violative of the provisions of the National Electoral Chamber and affect constitutional rights and guarantees and fundamental policies, leaving the Federal Case reserved (art. 14 of law 48 by virtue of the violation of constitutional guarantees), issuing during the substantiation of this Precautionary Measure not to Innovate.

“Supplementary Instruction is also requested so that they can testify as witnesses of the documentary presentation on November 19, 2024 at 11:51 p.m. All of this in accordance with the foundations set forth below,” the presentation argued.

The text also adds that the “resolution of the Electoral Board by rejecting the officialization of the List that we represent, causes irreparable burden since it affects political rights and constitutional guaranteesto candidates and voters. since otherwise what was decided by the Electoral Board of the Justicialista Party would be validated, by rejecting the Officialization of the “Federals, a cry from the heart” list.