Loan case: twist in the investigation points to two people in the inner circle of the child’s family

Loan case: twist in the investigation points to two people in the inner circle of the child’s family

The premiums of Loan Danilo Peña they meet increasingly committed in the case investigated by the disappearance of the child five months ago in Currents. Thus, the magnifying glass is increasingly positioned on the family sphere.

It is about Camila Núñez and Macarena Peñaolder cousins ​​of the five-year-old boy, who are very involved in justice. However, there are still several steps left to determine his guilt.

This way, the federal judge of Goya, Cristina Pozzer Penzoordered that psychological and psychiatric tests be carried out on Loan’s two cousins. The main person in charge of the investigation intends, at least, find new clues.

Likewise, the magistrate ordered that these tests be carried out in the Psychiatry and Psychology Office of the Tax Investigation Corps in the province of Jump. Thus, the two cousins ​​were transferred from July 9 to the northern province.

The tests will be carried out this Tuesday, November 5, by a group of specialists, in order to be able extract information regarding the whereabouts of the child last seen on June 13 in the his grandmother Catalina’s field.

The signaling towards Loan’s blood cousin and his political cousin is given, among other things, by the silence of those detained in the case.

march loan currents.jpg

Loan disappeared five months ago and his whereabouts are still being investigated.

Archive

Macarena was part of the lunch organized by Catalina on the same day of Loan’s disappearance. The same is the daughter of Laudelina Penawho remains behind bars in Salta, like her husbands Antonio Benitez.

Meanwhile, Camila would have maintained a relationship with Carlos Perezthe ex-marine also detained with his wife, Victoria Caillavasuspected of being the organizers of the kidnapping of the minor.

A new clue that puts the Pérez-Caillava couple in the spotlight again

The man accused by his own daughter of bury a child in Corrientes would have a business deal with Caillava and Pérez. In detail, the last detainee would carry out tasks for the owner of a field that is commercially linked with the son of the marriage.

This new suspect would have direct links with the Pérez-Caillava marriagethe main ones accused of Loan’s disappearance. After learning the minor’s story, the police located and interrogated this man, the minor’s father.

“The little girl’s statement is an important advance”research sources assured. They also stated that the The father’s arrest occurred in a context of great secrecywithout additional leaks so as not to hinder the cause.

The minor’s father now detained maintains connections with Carlos Pérez and Victoria Caillavawhich raises more doubts and fuels the hypothesis that there could be a cover-up network behind the case.

The family’s lawyer ruled out the accident theory

The lawyer Juan Pablo Gallegolawyer for Loan’s parents, pointed out the minor’s aunt, Ladeulina Peña, and spoke about the time of the investigation and his clients.

“(The investigation) reached day 100 and They dimmed the lights on something that supposedly everyone was worried about,” began the lawyer, who spoke of “a smear campaign.” “In that context, 15 days ago Loan’s parents came looking for me.“he stated.

Regarding the first days of the investigation, he pointed out that what was done was “to cover up an effective, real and concrete investigation, which we are doing in these 15 daysGallego pointed out that his “only objective in this case” is to find Loan and that “what was done in these 15 days was never done during the first 100 days.”

“There are no more spectacular hypotheses,” he said, in relation to the versions that point to an accident or that the child is in other parts of the country. “I think we are radically changing history, we are doing it without fuss, without so much spectacularity.” The results are beginning to be seen,” he concluded about the investigation.

Regarding Laudelina’s role in the case, Gallego pointed out that she “knows, participated, lied and hindered” the investigation. Regarding his desire to testify, and his reversal, he mentioned: “He had stated his willingness to lie again and in the last hours that will declined.”

Source: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts