In a confusing interpretation of gender issues, the defendant’s lawyer attempted to argue that Cristina was the driving force behind the gender issues.
In harsh terms the Court rejected a request from Brenda Uliarte’s lawyer who, with an unusual argument, wanted Cristina Kirchner testify again in the trial investigating the attempt on his life. The lawyer Alejandro Cipolla sought to destroy the expansion of the accusation of gender violence in the mode of political violence to which the Court has already accepted. With this objective, he requested that the victim be called to testify again because she had said at the time that is not feminist.
In a confusing interpretation of gender issues, Cipolla tried to argue that Cristina was the driving force behind gender issues and that “men and women cannot be pigeonholed for reasons of biology or science, but rather they must be self-perception. And he added that “even in statements she (by Cristina) has stated that she is not a feminist and other issues, so I understand that would be essential to first determine whether or not one considers oneself a woman“.
Brenda Uliarte.jpg
Telam
The atmosphere became tense in the hearing after the defender’s words to the point that the president of the Court herself, Sabrina Namer, gave a harsh warning in this regard. “The questioning, the questioning of Cristina Fernández de Kirchner’s status as a woman is surprising. There are questions that can be asked for the exercise of the right of defensebut another thing is that that testimony is required to prove the status of woman of whom, beyond their position or not with respect to feminism, I understand that they self-perceive, act and does not generate any doubt about her status as a woman”
Cristina’s complaint warned that the defender’s request “It is almost a new exercise of violence”. For the lawyer Marcos Aldazabal the objective is far from the file and only searches “generate a media impact” and demanded that the Court remember “that here there was a victim of an attempted assassination and femicide, which is why we request the order of the hearing and that these revictimizations not be allowed. “We are concerned about what just happened and we want it to not happen again,” he added.
Cipolla’s argument surprised to such an extent that the Fernando Sabag Montiel’s own defense rejected him: “There are limits that cannot be crossed. Calling the main victim of the case again and re-victimizing her for something that she already had the opportunity to answer is not appropriate,” he considered. the lawyer María Fernanda López Puleiro.
Sabag Montiel’s cell phone
After several twists and turns, the cell phone of the main accused, Fernando Sabag Montiel, will finally be examined for the third time. This Wednesday, Federal Oral Court 6 advanced with the request for a third attempt to be made to open the phone. The complaint had requested that Iranian professionals performed the maneuver of opening the mobilebut the judge reported that no appointment was made for the Cellebrite company to do so. Therefore, with the endorsement of the parties, they will try for the last time. experts from Argentina. The point is that the methodology to be used carries a high risk. All content could be lost. Experts from the General Directorate of Investigations and Technological Support for Criminal Investigations (DATIP), which depends on the Attorney General’s Office, warned that the analysis involves high risks which could permanently render the original device unusable.
However, despite having been mysteriously factory reset due to irregularities in the chain of custody hours after the attack (which is being investigated in a separate file), a part of the information could be extracted, which is already part of the file. This will then be the third and final attempt to find more clues about the intellectual authorship and financing of the attack.
Source: Ambito
I am an author and journalist who has worked in the entertainment industry for over a decade. I currently work as a news editor at a major news website, and my focus is on covering the latest trends in entertainment. I also write occasional pieces for other outlets, and have authored two books about the entertainment industry.
