The Chamber’s first AI course was attended by more than 400 people and notable exhibitors.
The Federal Court of Criminal Cassation This Monday began carrying out a series of training sessions on the impact and applications of the IArtificial intelligence in judicial areas.
The course was organized by Mariano Borinskypresident of the court, and was coordinated by Laura KvitkoSecretary of the Chamber. The exhibitors at the event were Daniel Petronevice president of the Federal Chamber of Criminal Cassation, Juan Manuel Garaypro-secretary of the Chamber, and Hernan Elmandirector of Digital Center for Judicial Documentation of the National Judicial Council.
The Chamber’s first AI course was attended by more than 400 people and featured exhibitors.
AI Training of the Criminal Cassation Chamber
The event began with an opening speech by borinsky, who highlighted the advantages of AI to optimize efficiency, speed and precision in judicial processes. At the same time, he warned of key challenges, such as privacy protectionthe risks of bias and hallucinations in models, and the need for ongoing training.
For his part, Hernán Elman spoke about the processes of technological innovation in the judicial field. He explained the evolution of artificial intelligence systems, from a rules-based approach to one based on data, and analyzed how these tools are already transforming judicial systems in different parts of the world. Additionally, he shared practical strategies for effective use of prompts and reflected on future trends in technological development.
Juan Manuel Garay referred to the role of AI as complementary toolunderscoring the importance of preserving human intervention in critical decisions that require ethical and legal judgment. It also analyzed the risks associated with biases and hallucinations in AI models.
In the practical part of his presentation, Garay presented two custom GPT systems. One of them designed to reformulate legal texts in clear language, following the guidelines of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation. The other, aimed at the analysis of cases of possession of narcotics for personal consumption, in which the IA examined fictitious cases based on the principles of the CSJN “Arriola” ruling.
The day closed with a space for questions that lent itself to opening dialogue and clearing up doubts about the use of artificial intelligence.
Source: Ambito
I am an author and journalist who has worked in the entertainment industry for over a decade. I currently work as a news editor at a major news website, and my focus is on covering the latest trends in entertainment. I also write occasional pieces for other outlets, and have authored two books about the entertainment industry.
