The call of radicalism and the PRO sought to eliminate indefinite elections in the unions. Peronism and the federal blocks did not accompany.
In the first of a series of sessions at the Chamber of Deputiesa call from radicalism did not reach the quorum for the project of “ union democracy“, which he intended reform the organization of the unions. Hours later, a session is called by Peronism and dissident radicalism to discuss the repeal of the DNU 846/2024 on free exchangea meeting for which the viability of the quorum is also doubted.
The initiative aimed to elimination of indefinite re-elections for general secretaries, the elimination of the mandatory solidarity fee and the implementation of the clean record for union members. Likewise, the regulation of a five-member body in the leadership of unions with representation of minorities was proposed and new election schemes for union social work were established.
Despite having the support of the UCR and the PRO, at the last meeting of the Labor Legislation Commission The project obtained 15 signatures (to reach the majority they needed 16) and did not reach the opinion. Federal Meeting and Union for the Homeland They oppose the reform, while Freedom Advances did not support the majority in the midst of its negotiations with the CGT.To the session 111 deputies attended (18 of the quorum) and there were 146 absentees. “The Government did not play hard to make the reform possible,” he responded. Martin Tetaz, who called the session.
Quorum of Deputies
Mariano Fuchila
The challenge of Tetaz was twofold: achieve the quorum and convince the presidency of the Chamber of Deputies -in the hands of Martin Menem– that reinterprets the legislative regulations. Or, yearn for a special two-thirds majority that would be unattainable. He didn’t even reach the first goal. “This was something favorable for the unions because it proposed that they be more competitive and transparent,” said the deputy once the session had ended, and pointed out that the union leadership is “the main caste that has to end” and that the lack of quorum represented a triumph because “a beginning of revelation occurred.”
Union democracy: the UCR forced the regulations to get the session
Despite not having reached a quorum, the head of the Labor Legislation Commissionthe deputy Martín Tetaz (UCR)was referred to a vote on April 21, 2010which points out that “For a dispatch to be valid, the signature of the majority of the members of each of the commissions is necessary.”.
In contrast to that vote, Tetaz argued that “it is legal that the body cannot change the regulations without a prior opinion from the corresponding commission or in any case it would have needed a special majority” and concludes: “Considering that this interpretative resolution was approved with 141 positive votes vs. 91 negative votes […] cannot in any way correct the regulation forward“.
Martin Tetaz
Mariano Fuchila
Another peculiarity is that in the last meeting of the Labor Legislation Commission The project did obtain a majority opinion the UCR and the PRO of reform of the labor creditswhich establishes a pure interest rate of 3% per year” for compensation while the time of the judicial litigation elapses. However, that proposal was not included in the agenda.
Fernando Brovelli Report.-
Source: Ambito
I am an author and journalist who has worked in the entertainment industry for over a decade. I currently work as a news editor at a major news website, and my focus is on covering the latest trends in entertainment. I also write occasional pieces for other outlets, and have authored two books about the entertainment industry.
