The competitors have submitted. Now the program of the CDU and CSU stands for the federal election. Commentators are skeptical of the election promises, and there is even talk of “imposture”.
With a 140-page program, the CDU and CSU want to prevent the Union from being thrown out of the Chancellery after the Merkel era. The party leaders Laschet and Söder now have almost 100 days to convince people of their new unity and the goals they have set themselves. Commentators are particularly critical of the election manifesto. It is “by far not as fast-paced and innovative as one could have expected,” says “Zeit Online”. The “Tagesschau” recognizes “a conglomeration that lacks the big headline”.
“Sparkling ideas – no news”: the media response to the Union’s election manifesto
“Southgerman newspaper”: “It does not fit to announce relief and a balanced budget when at the same time apparently 100 billion euros of new debts are necessary to make ends meet. That the Union is pretending to be soon – unlike tax estimators and economic researchers predict – money enough there is hardly serious. The financial situation that the next government will find in autumn 2021 will be completely different from 2017. (…) That not only makes coalition talks more difficult, but also governing. “
“Time online”: “The Union now also has a program for the Bundestag election – but it is nowhere near as fast-paced and innovative as one could have expected. (…) It is the Union’s big bet. It has the momentum for them A moment back on your side. After the pandemic initially stoked the longing for the familiar, i.e. Merkel and the Union, the pendulum swung back in the second and third waves. The list of deficiencies grew longer with each lockdown day. Now it is finally working The incidence is falling, the summer could be good. And the last elections in Saxony-Anhalt have shown that the desire for renewal does not seem that great. The CDU hopes that this will not change by election day. “
“Tagesschau.de”: “The Union wants to please everyone and not alienate anyone. The result is a hodgepodge, which lacks the big headline. The election manifesto shows how a people’s party is simply trying to continue to govern, even when the end of the Merkel era is already visible. Prosperity for everyone. This is how they always won elections. But in the last 16 years the content has been rather irrelevant. (…) They won’t be able to please everyone. Sparkling ideas – nil. All the more they need one in election summer real spirit of unity, which the voters in Baden-Württemberg could take from them just as much as in Saxony-Anhalt. “
“taz”: “The Union has a lax relationship with programs. Somehow you need them, but please do not get in the way of government. The principle counts little, the situation a lot. That has long been the Union’s recipe for success, Merkel has perfected it. The Laschet Union works in exactly the same way. This election manifesto is an intellectual impertinence. (…) Less income, the same expenditure, no debts – no Swabian housewife would believe in this fairy tale can’t keep ‘. But that’s trickery. “
“New Osnabrück Newspaper”: “The Union has agreed with Armin Laschet on a candidate for chancellor who stands for balance, not for extremes. His program is compatible with many partners; these should then give him a green, red or liberal accent Wrong. The pension idea, for example, as a state to pay money into a fund for every child, is somewhat revolutionary. The concept brings back memories of the successful sovereign wealth fund in Norway, into which oil money flows and is then broadly invested. Contradictions elsewhere are annoying. The financing of many projects also remains a mystery. However, the Union has deliberately remained vague here.
“Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung”: (…) But the rise of China to a world power and Putin’s revisionism are forcing the economic power in the center of Europe to determine their position: How do we protect our values and achieve our goals in a world in which aggressive authoritarian regimes are on the advance? The Union’s electoral program provides answers that sometimes differ significantly from those of the Greens and the SPD. The CDU and CSU are expressly committed to nuclear deterrence and German participation in it. You stand by the two percent commitment to NATO. They demand that Germany must be more ready than before to use military instruments in the defense of its values. (…) In terms of foreign policy, the CDU and CSU have arrived in the 21st century. (…)
“Handelsblatt”: “Overall, the program fits Armin Laschet’s political style. He has covered all the wings – a little economically liberal, a little social, and there is also something for families and the climate. There is no optimism. But that should be fine with many voters plagued by pandemics They would rather go back to their old life than make a radical change in their everyday life. For many, it is already complicated enough. “
David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.
