The Pet tracking chips They have become a popular tool among dog owners and cats. These devices promise to offer greater security and tranquility, by allowing Locate pets in case of loss or loss. However, it is important to understand how these chips work and what their limitations are before deciding to implement them in our pets.
Tracking chips technology has advanced significantly in recent years, offering different options for pet owners. There are two main types of chips: GPS and RFID. Each has its own characteristics and advantages, but they also present certain risks that it is crucial to know.
What is and how a tracking chip works
A tracking chip is a small device that It is implanted under the skin of the petusually among the shoulder blades. This chip contains a unique code that can be scanned with a special reader. When scanning, the code provides information about the owner of the pet, facilitating its identification and Location in case of loss. The implementation process is fast and generally painless for the animal.
The tracking chip Does not emit signals or require batterieswhich makes it lasting and low maintenance. However, it is important to keep in mind that the chip only Provides information when scanning with a compatible reader. This means that, for the chip to be effective, it is necessary that the pet is found and taken to a place where there is an available reader, such as a veterinary clinic or an animal shelter.
The differences between a GPS chip and one RFID for pets
GPS and RFID chips are two different technologies used for pet tracking. GPS chips use satellites to determine the exact location of the pet in real time. These devices are more precise and allow the owners to monitor the location of their pets through an application on their mobile phone. However, GPS chips require batteries and a subscription to a service to functionwhich can be expensive in the long term.
On the other hand, RFID chips (radiofrequency identification) do not emit signals or require batteries. These chips contain a unique code that can be scanned with a special reader. Although they do not provide real -time information, RFID chips are cheaper and durable. The main disadvantage is that they only work when they scan with a compatible reader, which limits its usefulness compared to GPS chips.
According to data from the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA), more than 50% of dogs and 40% of cats with microchip were returned to their families, compared to only 21.9% and 1.8%, respectively, of those without this technology
The risks of placing a tracking chip to your pet
Although tracking chips offer significant benefits, they also have certain risks. One of the main risks is the possibility of infection at the implantation site. Although the procedure is generally safe, there is always a small risk of complications. In addition, some pet owners express concerns about the privacy and security of the information stored in the chip.
Another risk is excessive dependence on technology. Pet owners They can trust the tracking chip too much and neglect other safety measuressuch as the use of necklaces with identification plates. It is important to remember that tracking chips are an additional tool, but do not replace traditional petty identification and care practices.
Source: Ambito
I am an author and journalist who has worked in the entertainment industry for over a decade. I currently work as a news editor at a major news website, and my focus is on covering the latest trends in entertainment. I also write occasional pieces for other outlets, and have authored two books about the entertainment industry.
