On the other hand, its green policy received a strong blow with the decision of the highest court that determined that the Environmental protection agency The EPA cannot promulgate general rules to regulate emissions from coal-fired power plants, which produce almost 20% of the electricity in the United States.
Biden and a new immigration policy
By a narrow majority of five to four, the Supreme Court justices ruled that ending the expulsion of migrants does not violate immigration law because it grants executive discretion.
The ruling is excellent news for Biden’s immigration policy, which was on the ropes, and a breath of fresh air after several political setbacks due to the latest Supreme Court rulings on abortion, carrying weapons or fighting against climate change.
The United States government asked the Supreme Court to review the judicial ruling issued in December by an appeals court that ordered it to maintain the Migrant Protection Protocols (known as “Stay in Mexico” or MPP) introduced by Trump, in 2019 .
As soon as he arrived at the White House, Biden suspended the Stay in Mexico immigration plan, but a judge from a court in the state of Texas (south) ordered it to be reinstated “in good faith”.
On December 6, the United States partially reactivated the program, after consulting with Mexicoto comply with that order, while moving forward with an appeal filed with the appellate court, which upheld the district court.
The White House considers the Stay in Mexico program to be “ineffective and inhumaneAccording to the Office of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in May a new record was broken for encounters with irregular migrants on the southern border of the United States (239,416), that is, each time one of them arrives and surrenders to a authority or when you try to cross and are stopped.
Limits to the fight against global warming
The US Supreme Court on Thursday limited federal means to fight global warming, in a ruling that could further complicate the regulatory efforts from the White House.
The Biden government, which defends a global green agenda, immediately denounced a “devastating” decision and asked the Congress that “puts America on the path to a cleaner, more secure energy future.
“Setting a cap on carbon dioxide emissions at a level that would require a national waiver of coal to generate electricity could be a relevant solution to the current crisis. But it is not credible that Congress gave the EPA the authority to pass such a measure,” Justice John Roberts wrote on behalf of the Conservative majority.
But his three progressive colleagues disassociated themselves from a considered decision.”terrifying“. “The Supreme Court stripped the Environmental Protection Agency of the power given to it by Congress to respond to the ‘most pressing issue of our time,'” the judge wrote. Elena Kaganremembering that in the last decade the United States experienced the six warmest years in its history.
Reflecting the divisions in American society on environmental issues, the decision was immediately welcomed by the Republican Party, which is hostile to any federal regulation and a proponent of fossil fuels.
Dismayed, environmental advocacy organizations highlighted the widening gap between the United States and the rest of the world.
Beyond the EPA, this decision could limit the efforts of all federal regulatory agencies, including occupational safety and health (OSHA). Democrats fear several regulations will be scrapped in the coming months.
Source: Ambito
David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.
