“We received Iran’s response on Monday night. We are studying it and we are consulting with the other partners” of the agreement as to “the way forward,” a spokeswoman for Iran told AFP. Joseph Borrellhead of the European Union diplomacy and facilitator of the recent indirect negotiations between Tehran and Washington.
An hour earlier, Tehran said it had sent its response to “end text” drawn up by the European Union, pending a rapid response.
“Iran sent its written response to a draft of the draft Vienna agreement, and announced that an agreement will be reached if the United States reacts with realism and flexibility“, indicated the official agency Irna.
Iran’s response
According to the Iranian agency Isna, which cites an “informed source”, Tehran now expects “to receive the response from the other party in the next two days”.
“The disagreements have to do with three points. The United States has verbally expressed its flexibility in two of them, but that should be included in the text,” the agency said without further clarification.
“The third question has to do with the guarantee that the agreement is lastingAnd that depends on the realism of the United States in reassuring Iran.”
None of the parties specified which are the points in suspense. The Iranian demand that the United States remove the Revolutionary Guards from its blacklist is no longer on the agenda, according to a senior European official.
However, and after the precedent of 2018 with Trump, Tehran’s demands for guarantees on the durability of the agreement remain on the table, and the Iranian demand that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) close the chapter on undeclared facilities in Iran, where traces of enriched uranium were found.
According to Mohammad Marandi, adviser to the Iranian team of negotiators, “the issues on hold are not difficult to settle. They have to do with Iran’s fear of past failures by the United States and the European Union.”
“I cannot say that we are going to reach an agreement, but we are closer than before“, he wrote on Twitter.
America is silent
On Monday, the Department of State The American refused to say whether the United States is willing to approve the plan presented by the EU, and limited himself to affirming that he will take “contact with Mr. Borrell”.
“The only way to achieve a mutual return to the JCPOA,” the English acronym by which the agreement is known, “is for Iran to abandon its unacceptable demands, which go far beyond the agreement,” the State Department said.
The Department spokesman also refused to clarify whether Washington will lift its sanctions if Tehran approves the EU text.
The messy negotiations
The negotiations between Iran and the great powers, launched in April 2021 in Vienna, seek to reactivate the 2015 international agreement, which guarantees the civilian nature of Iran’s nuclear programaccused of wanting to equip himself with the atomic weapon despite his repeated denials.
The “final” commitment proposed by the EU on August 8, after a hiatus of months in the talks, favors the return of the United States to the agreement, from which it unilaterally withdrew in 2018 at the initiative of the then president donald trump.
It would also allow lifting of sanctions imposed on Iran, on the condition that Iran respect its commitments and stop exceeding the prescribed limits of uranium enrichmentas well as other sensitive nuclear activities that raise fears of a military dimension.
The 2015 nuclear deal was signed by Iran on one side and the United States on the other. United Kingdom, China, France, Germany Y Russia. The historic pact was torpedoed with Washington’s withdrawal in 2018 and the reestablishment of US sanctions, which are suffocating the Iranian economy. In response, Iran progressively stopped honoring its commitments.
Source: Ambito

David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.