Town meeting (AC) questioned whether he would effectively support the social security reform project after his participation in the Special Commission of the Chamber of Deputies. The lobbying deputies, Alvaro Perrone and Martin Sodano they raised the Executive power the condition “not negociable” to download the proposal retirement age from 65 to 63 years.
However, the position generated a lot of noise even inside the space itself, since its own leader, Senator Guido Manini Riosignored the proposal and assured that lowering the retirement age “is not a concrete proposal from the party.”
Deputy Sodano stated at a press conference that in addition to the retirement age, from CA they seek to eliminate the authorization that will allow AFAPs (Administrators of Pension Savings Funds) to invest amounts outside the countrysomething that was ruled out outright by Manini Ríos.
Another point in which CA has differences is in the calculation period that defines the replacement rate with which a person is going to retire, asking that they pass from 25 to 15 years. Failure to review these points threatens the other partner parties of the Multicolor Coalitionwho would be left empty-handed if they did not have the votes of CA.
In another order, the government alliance seeks to bring a position closer to CA by excluding the Notary Box, they had requested that it be granted differential treatment. From the National Party They do not see a reduction in the retirement age as viable, nor in the calculation of the replacement rate, but they trust in having the support of CA by giving in to other more feasible requests.
“I do not know under what title the deputies raised that,” said Manini Ríos
Manini Ríos showed his surprise before the press after the claims planted by his co-religionists when affirming that he does not know “by title of what” They raised a drop in the retirement age, because their party has not specifically raised it.
The leader of CA maintained, to the surprise of many, that “we do not want the age to go to 63 now” because “The issue is already more than discussed”and that, on the other hand, the proposals continue to be the same with respect to the average retirement assets and the investments of the AFAPs, since the latter “They are a risk that we cannot control”.
In the Colorado Party they affirm that “nobody can get angry” when they want to discuss some articles
In another space that is part of the government coalition there are also certain objections. In a recent interview with scope.comthe red deputy conrado rodriguez He assured that they have “some different vision on some articles.”
“As long as the reform maintains the three pillars, we are willing to accompany it. Now, if we see that there are articles that do not include certain cases or deserve to be modified, we are willing to do that job. AND no one can be angry about this”, stated the legislator.
In addition, on the discussed point of the Notarial Fund, Rodríguez proposed a “window period” for five years to “see how it continues to work” and then define whether or not it should be included in the reform.
Source: Ambito
