Former Presidential Custodian Alexander Astesianowas summoned as a witness to testify and contribute in his own case in all the lines of investigation that branched out from it, the prosecutor in charge of the case, Sabrina Floresyou will receive it in the Flagrancy Prosecutor’s Office 12th shift this Wednesday at 1:00 p.m.
To prepare the declaration instance, Asthesian met on Tuesday with his lawyer, Marcos Prietowho assured Underlined that the inmate has a sentence like any other person. “Astesian is paying society, fulfilling as one more person deprived of libertyeat when you have to eat, fall asleep when the light goes out,” he said.
On the other hand, he gave his perspective on the case of the ex-custodian. “There are various actors in society who, despite this, continue to name him publicly, I don’t know with what intentions, when reality tells us that other members of the cause are at home. With what it seems that the interest of doing justice was not with Asthesian but with whom, and where did he work Astesian”, said.
In this sense, he assured that “it has already been proven and it was concluded in the investigative stage that did not make any passport for the group or any type of secret investigation or to legislators or anyone ”. On the other hand, it was also proven that “there was no crime in the famous fish, nor in many other things that were said in relation to Away Astesiano”.
The ex-security man is serving a sentence of 4 years and 6 months in prison for association for crime, conjunction ofl public interest with the private, revelation of secrecy, and influence peddling.
Astesiano’s letter to his brother
In a letter sent to his brother, the former presidential custodian, he assured that “they caught him as a scapegoat” and that the case against him was “armed and “orchestrated” to serve as a media distraction. In the letter to his brother Fabricio , the former head of security of the president Luis Lacalle Pou he noted that his sentence was “disproportionate”, “inflated for the tribune” and “pour la galerie”.
In addition, the inmate adds in the letter that the day before the sentence, his lawyer had told him that the Justice He had nothing convincing against him because of the issue of Uruguayan passports to Russian citizens, and that everything “was just smoke.”
“There was never any passport, there was never any association: what’s more, no one ever told me they wanted false passports, never. They just wanted to expedite a process, which was verified in the minutes,” he added.
Source: Ambito
