They were summoned for appearing in the chats that served as evidence in the case for sexual abuse of minors.
The Attorney General’s Office summoned the two secretaries of the former senator of the National Party (PN), Gustavo Penadésfor appearing in the chats that served as evidence in the case for sexual abuse juvenile.
Although the former legislator’s secretaries are not necessarily involved in the case of sexual exploitation of minors, they could provide important data on the activity of Gustavo Penadés. Both people work or worked for the defendant.
Next Tuesday, October 10, Gustavo Penadés and the history teacher, Sebastian Mauvezinaccused of being the link between the former senator and the minors, will be formalized after the request of the 6th Shift Sexual Crimes prosecutor, Alicia Ghionewithin the framework of the investigation.
The Prosecutor’s Office understands that there is sufficient evidence, both at the testimonial level and in photographic and film material, to charge Gustavo Penadés and Sebastian Mauvezin for the crime of promising remuneration or retribution to minors for the execution of acts of a sexual nature.
So much Gustavo Penadésas Sebastian Mauvezin They reiterated on several occasions to the media that they are innocent, and that the case is part of an “orchestrated plot” to harm them. This suspicion has already been dismissed by the prosecutor. Ghione.
“It would be a disappointment if he lied to us,” said Jorge Gandini.
The PN senator, Jorge Gandinireferred to the investigation on Gustavo Penadés and admitted that the government is “expectant” about the ruling, while admitting that “it would be a great disappointment if he had lied to us.”
“We still don’t have a court ruling,” he said. Gandini last month, although he admitted: “Obviously, it would be a great disappointment to many of us if he had lied to us, because he told us on the bench that everything was a lie. We will see what the Justice“.
At the same time, the white senator highlighted that Gustavo Penades He had been “a fundamental actor” in politics, so “that was what made us not immediately disbelieve, but we were going to wait for the facts to speak.”
Source: Ambito
