“Skimpflation”: Where manufacturers are now saving on food

“Skimpflation”: Where manufacturers are now saving on food

“Skimpflation” is often difficult to grasp for consumers. The only thing that helps is comparing old and new packaging.
Image: colourbox.de

Your favorite chocolate contains less marzipan, and the ice cream suddenly contains coconut oil instead of whipped cream. The products still cost the same or more in the supermarket than before. “Skimpflation” This is the name of this phenomenon, which is difficult for customers to identify when shopping. Unless you compare the ingredient lists on old and new packaging.

“Skimpflation” is from the English word “skimp” for skimping or saving and “inflation” compounded for inflation. Even if the financial effects cannot be specifically quantified, manufacturers are likely to secure significant savings with such recipe changes, says Armin Valet from the Hamburg Consumer Center. “For example, if a creamed spinach contains only 67 percent spinach instead of 88 percent in the package and is filled with water instead, that is definitely a huge cost saving because spinach is by far the most expensive ingredient.”

More water in the margarine

The expert knows similar examples with margarine: A well-known brand now contains only 60 percent fat instead of the 80 percent required for margarine – and more water instead. “Given the thousands of tons of annual production, that makes a big difference”says Valet. “Based on the world market prices for vegetable oil, this can easily run into the hundreds of thousands, perhaps even more. But that’s just a very rough estimate.” If there are marginal changes to the recipe, the savings are likely to be correspondingly lower. Through so-called shrinkflation – i.e. product packs with less content that are offered at the same price – manufacturers could save even more to the detriment of consumers.

Replacement can also go to health

But it’s not just consumers’ wallets that are affected; poorer formulations can also have a negative impact on their health. “For example, if sunflower oil is replaced with palm oil, the food will contain more saturated fat”says a spokeswoman for the consumer organization Foodwatch. Replacing high-quality ingredients with sugar is also problematic for health. Manufacturers should provide transparent information about recipe changes – and if they use inferior ingredients, they should also reduce the price, said the spokeswoman. It cannot be the case that consumers, who are already having to dig deeper into their pockets when shopping, also receive even worse quality – “while manufacturers make additional profits in the process”.

However, the options for countering this are limited, as Valet makes clear. Manufacturers would have to adapt the ingredient lists when recipes were changed, but would not have to specifically state what had been changed. In some cases, the product name also has to be changed and margarine, for example, is then mentioned in the small print “spreadable fat”because it no longer contains enough fat. But the manufacturers would have already met the requirements. Some of them also stand “new recipe” on the packaging – but what exactly is new is not clear or only when there has actually been an improvement, says Valet. And still other manufacturers did not even shy away from telling consumers that things were getting worse “better recipe” for sale.

Also read:

  • Too few cuts, too much air: Commercial court condemns Manner
  • Vanilla drink exposed as a deception

“Extremely difficult to figure out”

Even if the problem is widespread, there are only a few complaints and when they do, they are often vague, says the expert. “Skimflation is extremely difficult for consumers to figure out, even more difficult than shrinkflation.” Valet suspects that there is a high number of unreported cases. The only way to combat this is for customers to be well informed and to look closely at the ingredients in finished products. However, better labeling of recipe changes would be desirable, demands Valet.

Food inspectors also see only limited options. “We can only take action if violations caused by misleading and deception are clearly suspected”says Maik Maschke, Chairman of the Federal Association of Food Inspectors in Germany. Often you only get information from third parties “At the grocery store shelves, consumers are upset about the shrinking size of the packaging, the increased price and the declining quality of the products.” If such complaints come to the attention of the official food control authorities, they will also be investigated. Samples of the food would then also be taken.

However, tests in the laboratory cannot be about the prices of the products, but only about the correct labeling of the ingredients and a comparison of the quantities on the package with the actual contents. “However, it is not uncommon for food manufacturers to change the recipe”says Maschke. This is also due to disruptions in supply chains, for example due to food shortages due to the war in Ukraine or the corona pandemic.

My themes

For your saved topics were

new articles found.

Loading




info By clicking on the icon you can add the keyword to your topics.

info
Click on the icon to open yours “my themes” Page. They have of 15 keywords saved and would have to remove keywords.

info By clicking on the icon you can remove the keyword from your topics.

Add the topic to your topics.

Source: Nachrichten

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts