He National Party unified positions against the plebiscite that promotes Citizens so that entry to the quartermasters whether by competition, an initiative that had already generated some discomfort within the Colorado Party.
The initiative is not frowned upon by the Broad Front, which in any case will define its official position this Monday. However, the main PN candidates, Álvaro Delgado and Laura Raffo, They agreed to be against it and pointed out: “The solution is not to plebiscite everything.”
Slim expressed himself after a meeting with representatives of the agricultural sector in Expo Melilla and pointed out: “I do not believe that the ways are to plebiscite everything and put everything in the Constitution, much less in an election year.”
“The solution is to work together. Among other things, there are 19 different statutes of municipal officials. It seems to me that there is a lot of work to be done on that logic,” warned the former Secretary of the Presidency.
Along the same lines, he said Raffo, who indicated: “I do not believe that everything has to be solved with modifications to the Constitution and with plebiscites.” “It seems to me that there are some things that can be solved with parliamentary agreements He noted and highlighted that in any case “it is an initiative that has just begun and not everyone is yet in agreement.” Colorado Party.”
At the same time, he advocated keeping accounts clear at the government level. “Any citizen has to be able to know if a person was hired, what they were hired for, and be at the service of the people. That is essential to give transparency and efficiency to the public service,” said Raffo, who shared the meeting with agricultural leaders.
From the Colorado Party they pointed out against “disqualifications and accusations”
The plebiscite, which replicates a project presented by the recently deceased senator Adrian Pena, It generated tensions within the red prisoner. In that sense, the Ciudadanos candidate, Robert Silva, He ruled: “There can be no personal disqualification or accusations or insinuations of the nature that were made.
“The bench does not deserve it and we do not deserve it, since what we are doing is defending a project presented in the Senate by Adrián Peña, but also, we firmly believe that it is the center of the discussion: transparency yes or transparency no,” Silva warned.
This is how he referred to the senator’s statements Germán Coutinho, who considered that it exists “political opportunism” in the initiative. Trying to tone it down, Tabare Viera, candidate supported internally by Coutinho, clarified that his sector agrees with “the substance of the issue”, but admitted that the proposal “took us by surprise” and questioned: “It was not good that we were not consulted.”
“It means continuing to play the Constitution and putting in the Constitution everything that we have differences,” he warned and concluded: “We do not occasionally achieve the necessary majorities in the laws.”
Source: Ambito
