Thus, he said that there was “a struggle” before the baby disappeared, in relation to a serious situation that would have been experienced in the previous one.
During an interview, the criminal lawyer indicated that there are several witnesses who claim that “Before kidnapping Loan they struggled over another child”. These are concrete testimonies that reinforce the suspicion that the kidnapping was premeditated.
In the same statement, the lawyer targeted Millapi, Laudelina and Ramírez on the part of an alleged organized planin order to kidnap Loan.
“There are no innocents here. Laudelina had a hand in Loan’s disappearance. They want us to believe that Millapi and Ramírez were looking the other way. They were two close marriages and they knew what they were doing. The kidnapping it was scheduled”said Gallego.
Likewise, the lawyer stated that the roles of each detainee have already been verified. Thus, he stressed that in the last 20 days There were important advances in the case.
According to Gallego, they are very closer to finding answers and that the latest evidence proves that Loan could be alive.
Finally, he mentioned other witnesses like Camila Núñez and Macarena Peña, who could offer relevant information to clarify the case. Justice will evaluate whether both can formally declare.
New data could change research
Under the case for the search for the 5-year-old boy, the lawyers Jorge Monti and Marcelo Hanson They asked the federal judge of Goya, Cristina Pozzer Penzothe dismissal of Monica Millapi and her husband Daniel “Fierrito” Ramírez. The couple participated in lunch and They went to pick oranges with Loan, Bernardino Benítez and four other children.
According to the defense, the couple He was ”in the wrong place at the wrong time” and ”It is proven that the moment of Loan’s disappearance occurred outside the sphere where they had vision”. In this way, the theory would benefit Benítez, Loan’s uncle by marriage.
Likewise, Millapi and Ramírez assured that, at first, His plans were not to attend the lunch since one less brother of the man was hospitalized in intensive care, with his evolution in a state of unknown. In any case, they changed the idea and ended up going with their youngest daughter and two other nephews, thus being the last to arrive at Catalina’s house.
In previous statements, The couple had commented that Loan was the only one of the children present who sat at the table where the adults were.. In addition, they indicated that Benítez was the one who invited Ramírez to go look for oranges about 600 meters from the boy’s paternal grandmother’s house.
A cell phone was activated that could contain key information about the disappearance
The activation of the device generated new lines of research, since could contain relevant information about the movements and communications of those involved, which would help clarify Loan’s disappearance.
Authorities are investigating whether the reactivation was accidental or intentional, which could indicate a network of complicities.
Codazzi commented in a previous interview about the difficulties of searching in the area, mentioning a nearby lagoon that was partially explored, which shows the complications and limitations in the search efforts to date.
“There is a lagoon nearby, they don’t know the name, which is large. In the provincial case there were five or six divers, and they searched for a day or a day and a half, but only on the coast,” explained the lawyer.
Source: Ambito
