Within the framework of the Legislation contained in section “7031 (c), PL 116-94” of the federal budget of USAstrict provisions on the EL INCOME ELDELLABILITY To the country. These measures are designed to combat acts of significant corruption and Serious human rights violationspromoting the transparency and the Accountability In the international arena.
According to the legal text, “the officials of foreign governments and their direct relatives on whom the Secretary of State possess reliable information that they have participated, directly or indirectly, in acts of significant corruption or in one serious violation of human rightsthey will not be eligible to enter the United States. ”
One of the most relevant elements of this standard is the Wide authority of the State Department to “designate or identify” those responsible, either public or privately. “He Secretary It will also designate or identify, publicly or privately, foreign governments officials and their direct relatives on those who have relevant information, ”emphasizes the document. This applies to both people who have not requested a visa and those whose implication in infractions has been proven.
These restrictions not only seek to punish individuals, but are also part of a broader strategy to combat Cleptocracy and the Human Rights Abuse worldwide.
However, the regulations contemplate certain Exceptions. According to the text, “individuals will not be inelegable to enter USA If your income contributes to important objectives of the application of US law or if necessary to comply with the Agreement on the United Nations Headquarters”This reflects the Strategic flexibility which allows to balance international commitments with national interests.
It is also clarified that these provisions should not be interpreted as an exemption from International obligations assumed by the United States.
He Secretary of State It also has the power of exempt to certain people affected by these sanctions if justified under specific criteria. “He Secretary may exempt from the application of paragraph (1) if it determines that the exemption would serve a Imperious national interest or if the circumstances that determined inelegability have changed enough. ”This margin of interpretation allows restrictions to conform to needs diplomatic and Geopolitics of USA.
Within the protocol of transparencythe regulations establish that they must be submitted periodic reports to the Congress. In detail, it is indicated that, “no later than 30 days after the promulgation of the law and each 90 days From now on, the Secretary of State will deliver a detailed report on each of the people declared ineophible in recent 12 months”The publication of these reports allows Accountability and a Formal monitoring of these sanctions.
On the other hand, the document indicates that sections will be included classified In reports, but all non -confidential information is required to be published in the State Department website. In this way, it seeks to guarantee the government transparency. In addition, it is emphasized that “the records related to the issuance or denial of visas will not be considered confidential”, which facilitates access to the reasons behind each decision.
Analysts highlight the importance of these measures to dissuade corruption globally. In short, the Section 7031 (C) represents an integral effort to sanction corruption and violations of Human Rightswith clear identification mechanisms, well -defined exceptions and a system of Accountability through public and legislative reports. This initiative reinforces the foreign policy of the United States, currently led by the Secretary Marco Rubio.
US expands sanctions against Latin American officials
The US government has intensified its sanctions against Latin American officials and former officialsprohibiting its entrance to the country as part of its strategy to combat the corruption and the human rights violations.
Cristina Kirchner Pj.jpeg
Archive
The most recent case occurred this Friday, when the Rubio Secretary announced sanctions against Cristina Kirchner and his former minister July of Vido Due to the judicial processes for corruption they face in Argentina. The measure imposed by the State Department includes the prohibition of admission to both of their direct relatives. In this way, the former Argentine ex -president joins an extensive list of officials in the region sanctioned by Washington.
Among the most notorious figures on this list are leaders Nicolás Maduro (Venezuela), Daniel Ortega (Nicaragua), Raúl Castro (Cuba) and Miguel Díaz-Canel (Cuba).
The former Paraguayan president also appears Horacio Cartesthe Honduran ex -president Juan Orlando Hernándezcurrently detained in USA by drug traffickingand the former Panamanian state Ricardo Alberto Martinelli.
The former Ecuadorian president Rafael Correa and his former vice president Jorge Glas have also been sanctioned by USAafter being accused of acts of corruption During your management.
Although in the past the United States applied these sanctions mainly against authoritarian regimes such as those of Venezuela, Nicaragua and Cubain recent years it has expanded its scope. This strategy seeks to face not only human rights violationsbut also those acts that threaten the democratic stability In the region.
Source: Ambito
