After federal judges suspended the tax measure when considering that the president had exceeded his authority, a court of appeals reversed and allowed the return of tariffs temporarily.
The president of USA, Donald Trump, He achieved an important triumph after a Federal Court of Appeals gave the right and authorized the return of import tariff argue that the president had exceeded his authority.
The content you want to access is exclusive to subscribers.
While he did not opinion regarding the measure, the Appeals Court of the Federal Circuit of Washington ordered the plaintiffs an answer before June 5 already the national administration Before 9 of the same month. Until then, Tariff lock will be temporarily suspended.


The White House had considered the ruling of the International Trade Court (CIT) was “Flagrantly erroneous” And he hoped that the decision in the appeal process would be reversed. In addition, he had warned that he could also request the immediate suspension of the execution of this failure to the Supreme Court of the United States.
Justice considered that Donald Trump’s tariffs are “illegal”
The surprising ruling that arrived on Wednesday night considered tariffs on the imported products imposed by President Donald Trump by arguing that the emergency law invoked by the White House does not grant unilateral authority to the government to apply that measure.
“The challenged tariff orders will be annulled and their application will be permanently prohibited. It is not a precautionary measure strictly adapted to circumstances; If the challenged tariff orders are illegal for the plaintiffs, they are for all, “the sentence indicates.
The Federal Court remarked that The competition to impose tariffs is from Congress, not from the president. And that the International Emergency Emergency Powers Law (IEEPA) It allows the agent to regulate imports and exports in response to certain non -war emergencies, while underlines that the trigger must be a “Unusual and extraordinary threat.”
The White House spokesman, Kush desai, questioned the resolution and assured that “It does not correspond to not chosen judges to decide how to adequately address a national emergency.” “The non -reciprocal treatment of other countries to the United States has fed the historical and persistent commercial deficits of our country,” he said in a statement cited by Bloomberg.
The government, he said, continues “committed to using all the levers of the Executive Power to address this crisis and restore US greatness.” The ruling was a categorical rejection of the legal foundations of some of Trump’s most emblematic and controversial actions in his second term. The government quickly presented an appeal warning.
Source: Ambito