As specified through a resolution, The list did not meet the minimum number of guarantees required. and presented irregularities in the federal distribution of those guarantees.
In this way, the elections will be carried out normally and The only list that will compete will be the one headed by the former president Cristina Kirchner.
Supporters of the governor of Rioja had challenged the members of the Board by arguing that they sought to favor the list of Cristina Kirchner and asked that the deadlines and procedures be suspended. However, the resolution did not grant the request, denied the accusations of bias and ratified the November 17 elections.
“We reject the decision of the party’s Electoral Board on the non-officialization of our ‘Federal’ list, based on totally incorrect and out of date arguments“, they say from the faction of Quintela. Through a message on the official account of “Federals, a cry from the heart”, they demanded that “correct compliance with the process is guaranteedin which transparency and democratic rights prevail.
The PJ Electoral Board explained the rejection of Quintela’s list
Regarding the lack of guarantees, the Board specified that “if they were presented, according to the Federal list in the number of 70,531 distributed in 4,703 templates of 15 guarantees (70,531 divided 4,703= 14.99) it follows that ALL of the payrolls endorsements should be complete in all your boxes”he explained. However, he pointed out that from the count it emerged that they found 4,464 forms to audit, for a total of 60,755 endorsements. “Ergo, they show that in the forms on record the number of guarantees issued is 13.6 endorsements per sheet of 15. Resulting then that of what was declared in the challenge presented (70,531 in 4,703 forms) All of them should contain 14.99 and not 13.6″, analyzes the document.
In addition, he warned that 6,809 of the guarantees They do not include photocopies of IDin addition to the fact that there are “photocopied returns (not originals) or they lack the signatures of the guarantors” and 5,195 with “illegible DNI or signatures on the forms ostensibly dissimilar to those displayed on the DNI”.
“The following exercise explains the logic of the quantities: assuming that what the presenters claim, the digital records of 70,531 were valid. Subtracting those already identified with inconsistencies (6,809 and 5,195) would yield a total of 58,527 valid endorsementswhich would not reach the minimum required in the electoral regulations of 2% of the registry (62,465),” explained the Electoral Board.
Source: Ambito
I am a 24-year-old writer and journalist who has been working in the news industry for the past two years. I write primarily about market news, so if you’re looking for insights into what’s going on in the stock market or economic indicators, you’ve come to the right place. I also dabble in writing articles on lifestyle trends and pop culture news.
