Pablo Moyano presented his resignation to the CGT Board of Directors

Pablo Moyano presented his resignation to the CGT Board of Directors

Moyano resigned from his position at the CGT through a brief note sent to the Board of Directors of the plant. For some time he had been asking to maintain a plan to fight against the libertarian adjustment, but recently the dialogue position prevailed.

Moyano’s resignation occurred after the meeting that the dialogue sector, including Gerardo Martínez (UOCRA), held this Thursday with the Government and businessmen of the Group of 6 to address pending issues of the union chapter of the Bases Law. In addition to the meeting, The central office ruled out a new national strike in the middle of the negotiations

image.png

@luddists

Added to this is the initiative of “union democracy” promoted in Congress by radicalism and PRO that advances on union organizations. Faced with this scenario, Moyano and other unions within the CGT raise the need to take a tougher position against the Government. Position rejected by the “small table” of the headquarters.

Union democracy: UCR forces the regulations and calls for a session to deal a blow to unions

After failing by a firm in its intention to obtain an opinion for the initiative of “union democracy“, which reforms the leadership formation of the unions and its scope on the affiliates, members of the Radical Civic Union (UCR) They presented a legal basis to insist on voting on the project in Deputies next week.

The initiative that aims to elimination of indefinite re-elections for general secretaries, the elimination of the mandatory solidarity fee and the implementation of the clean record for union members. Likewise, the regulation of a five-member body in the leadership of unions with representation of minorities is proposed and new election schemes for union social work were established. However, at the last meeting of the Labor Legislation Commission, The project promoted by the UCR and the PRO obtained 15 signatures and did not reach the opinion. That was no reason for Martín Tetaz (UCR), head of the commission, insist with the request.

The interpretation he makes Tetaz dates back to a vote on April 21, 2010which points out that “For a dispatch to be valid, the signature of the majority of the members of each of the commissions is necessary.”. In this framework, it analyzes that “it is legal that the body cannot change the regulations without a prior opinion from the corresponding commission or in any case it would have needed a special majority” and concludes: “Considering that this interpretative resolution was approved with 141 positive votes vs 91 negative votes […] cannot in any way correct the regulation forward“.

The request, which seeks to meet next Tuesday, November 26 (choice that would imply coming across another request for a meeting, from his radical peers from the bloc Democracy Forever), remained in the hands of the holder of the Chamber of Deputies, Martín Menem. Beyond the fact that his decision would set a precedent that would reform the interpretation of legislative practice, it is pertinent to highlight that Freedom Advances nor did it accompany in its entirety the opinion of the UCR.

Another peculiarity is that in the last meeting of the Labor Legislation Commission The project did obtain a majority opinion the UCR and the PRO of reform of the labor creditswhich establishes a pure interest rate of 3% per year” for compensation while the time of the judicial litigation elapses. However, that proposal was not included in the agenda.

Source: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts