In detail, Villarruel published a post on X for a few minutes where he assured that “What is happening (with Gallo) is a sadly obvious consequence. But since I am not from the security area, I do not have an opinion on the sanctions or actions that should be taken.” After this, Bullrich shot at the vice president and responded that ““It is shameful that he uses Nahuel Gallo to gather likes.”a message that inaugurated a new chapter in the open-air internal affairs of the ruling party.
Guillermo Francos evaluated Victoria Villarruel’s criticism of Patricia Bullrich
Once again, the Chief of Staff gave statements about a conflict between government officials and sought to tone down the discussion. Regarding Villarruel’s post, Francos stated: “It was a chicanery that didn’t make sense.“.
“I deal with Cabinet issues, with the things that seem to me transcendent and important“, explained the official and, seeking to quickly turn the page, he added: “As it is not good for the Government, it seems to me that it is an issue that must be left aside, I do not think it is important to discuss it.”
However, later the head of the ministers stated that what was said by the head of the upper house is “an opinion with which I do not agree” and, in addition, he considered that Villarruel “is wrong” indicating that Bullrich was the person who would have given Gallo permission to travel to Venezuela.
Along these lines, Francos went deeper: “It is something that did not correspond. “It’s a bad gesture after she had released a tweet where she lowered more than one change.”
The conflict between Villarruel and President Javier Milei – and his closest officials – has already had different instances of tension and crossfire. According to Francos, the link between both members of the Executive Branch has “its ups and downs” and He stated that they will try to prevent these types of issues from appearing in public.
“We have an election year ahead of us.“, recalled the Chief of Staff who later stated: “It is not going to be an easy year, but it is very different to have a block of 38 deputies from having one of 90 or 100. And it is very different to have 8 senators from having 16.”
The strong intersection between Patricia Bullrich and Victoria Villarruel in the case of a gendarme kidnapped in Venezuela
The crossing between both officials occurred through the social network “It is shameful that he uses Nahuel Gallo to gather likes“, responded the official after a post by the head of the Senate on social networks.
Villarruel had written earlier than her would not have authorized Gallo’s trip to Venezuela. “What is happening is a sadly obvious consequence. But since I am not in the security area, I do not have an opinion on the sanctions or actions that should be taken,” he stated through a post in X that he later deleted.
Bullrich did not remain silent in the face of internal criticism and stressed that “Argentines no longer tolerate cowardice or political opportunism” and pointed out that Villarruel accused her of “total ignorance of administrative channels and mechanisms“. In this regard, he clarified: “Travel authorization is granted through the Personnel Directorate. That is why I request that before issuing statements, next time report“he noted.
Later, the official redoubled the bet and during an interview on LN+ she attacked Villarruel again: “We are in a national security crisis, They have kidnapped a gendarme, they have told him that he is a spy, as if we were a dictatorship like theirs, and instead of worrying about seeing what we do, he worries about trying to assign blame”.
“Let the vice president take care of her things,” he said and clarified that the controversy generated the indignation of President Javier Milei. “I had a chat with the President. Feel this same. He feels that the entire country is busy with what we are going to do to bring back our gendarme and he sees this and is outraged.“, he stated, and added: “I think he is looking for the error instead of looking for his function, which is to support.”
The discussion did not end there because, in his post, Bullrich took the opportunity to question the head of the Upper House about the senators’ allowances and launched: “If you want to serve the Homeland, as an Argentine I ask you to take care of stopping the crazy and imminent salary increase in the Senate of the Nation. Citizens are making a heroic effort to overcome the inherited crisis and do not deserve to finance subsistence allowances. 9.5 million for any legislator,” he concluded.
As of January 1, the senators’ allowances will once again be “hooked” to the joint allowances of Congressional employees. In this way, if the legislators do not reverse this decision in the chamber, in the first month of the year they will collect 9.5 million pesos.
Source: Ambito
I am a 24-year-old writer and journalist who has been working in the news industry for the past two years. I write primarily about market news, so if you’re looking for insights into what’s going on in the stock market or economic indicators, you’ve come to the right place. I also dabble in writing articles on lifestyle trends and pop culture news.
