In the report prepared by the JLL real estate consultancy It is highlighted that in 6 out of 10 companies Your employees attend work all business days in person. Peru is the country that tops the ranking in the application of this model.
It is also evident that a 58% of companies Latin Americans have a model of five days of presencea 18% of foura 14% of three and only one 7% of two days. However, in Peru the number amounts to a 80% as for jobs that require five days in person.
This country is followed by Colombia with 72%, Brazil with 60%, Chile with 56%, Mexico 54% and Argentina 24%. Likewise, the report called “The future of work in Latin America”, points out that by 2030 the work scheme would be consolidated with four days of in-person presence in all countries.
JanUnited States and Canada, 43% of companies require in-person presence for five days, while in EEurope, Middle East and Africa 35%and in Asia 48%.
However, the decentralization of offices and the efficient use of the real estate sector will adapt at least one day of teleworking fixed in the coming years. This is also because collaborate to prioritize well-being and health of the employees.
However, it is estimated that 47% will offer additional salaries and benefits for those who attend the office in person by 2030. Additionally, a 62% expect to provide a network of additional spaces close to homes of the employees.
The problem faced by companies that eliminated teleworking
A recent study put on the table a problem that these companies will have to face by eliminating teleworking options: they will have difficulties filling their vacancies.
The analysis published by Revelio Labsa workforce analysis company, ensures that the growth of companies that do not offer hybrid or remote work options is growing less than those that do offer work flexibility.
The data analyzed from companies that published vacant positions since June 2022 indicate that those that announced job offers with hybrid or remote working hours registered a growth rate average of 0.6%, compared to 0.3% that were registered by those companies that offered 100% face-to-face vacancies. That is, they it costs more to fill new vacancies than those that offer a flexible schedule.
Source: Ambito
I am a 24-year-old writer and journalist who has been working in the news industry for the past two years. I write primarily about market news, so if you’re looking for insights into what’s going on in the stock market or economic indicators, you’ve come to the right place. I also dabble in writing articles on lifestyle trends and pop culture news.
