The engine? A 100% reduction in employer contributions (which ark with employers) for a year and the imputation of state assistance to salary. It seems brilliant. But you have to wonder: Will it really work? Will it hold quality employment? Will not artificially generate labor demand?
The program was created by the Decree 551/2022 and his regulation ensures 100% of reduction of employer contributions (SIPA, PAMI, National Employment Fund, Family Assignments) for 12 months for net incorporations of beneficiaries of certain social plans. In addition, the employer can impute the state allocation received by the employee as part of the salary.
The current government extended the program until December 31, 2026 And it updated through the Joint resolution 1/2025 (Ministries of Human Capital and Economy). Incorporated new social programs such as Go back to work (in replacement of enhancing work), Social accompaniment, labor insertion and foster employment. It is estimated that, after a pilot stage with 5,800 incorporations and 1,300 companiesthe plan could favor more than 34,000 formal jobs between 2025 and 2026.
Clear Advantages: Encourage rapid formalization, reduces costs for the employer and offers a bridge (worth the redundancy) from social programs to registered work.
Now, what is not seen so clear: do new positions be created or others are only replaced? Will these jobs be sustainable when the benefit expires? Literature on active employment policies warns that salary subsidies do not always improve future employability and can generate inefficiencies.
Load reduction brings an inevitable comparison with labor flexibility. In certain cases, flexible can create employment, yes, but you can also precarize and even increase eventualitywhich threatens the traditional vision of a stable contract. Even with good intention, this policy can become an escape valve that blurs rights if it is not accompanied by controls and monitoring.
Bridge to employment is a well -intentioned program, elegant in its design, capable of catalyzing immediate formalization. It has the strength of joining the social with the productive: a clear passage that can be genuinely transformative if it is managed well. But the question remains: Will it be a lasting bridge or a tax parenthesis with passengers?
Rigorous monitoring, quality indicators (not only quantity), and territorial plans are needed to ensure that employment does not vast when the benefit is cut. A well -applied conservative logic requires that the acquired be respected: rights, stability, continuity. And the future perspective demands that this bridge is not seen as a Cheap subsidy, but as a real lever of development and dignity.
Source: Ambito
David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.
