Judicial intelligence in health: doctors are concerned that it will replace their clinical judgment and ask for a legal framework

Judicial intelligence in health: doctors are concerned that it will replace their clinical judgment and ask for a legal framework

November 22, 2024 – 06:00

The data arise from a survey carried out in three countries in the region by the medical platform Medscape. Most specialists also point out that its use should be under government supervision or medical associations.

freepik

The artificial intelligence It promises to transform medicine, but its implementation generates doubts and concern among health professionals. A recent platform survey Medscapecarried out with more than 3,000 doctors from Argentina, Brazil and Mexico, reveals that, although a large number of professionals show enthusiasm for the use of technology in health, certain fears also persist. The lack of regulations It is one of the points highlighted by professionals and the 84% of Argentine doctors calls for a legal framework to exist.

According to the survey, six out of ten doctors in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico are shown optimistic regarding the future of AI in health. However, the 42% of professionals Argentines express “a lot or “some” worry about the possibility of AI replacing your clinical judgment.

health AI.png

Beyond fears, 60% of Argentine doctors see favorable aspects in the implementation of AI.

Beyond fears, 60% of Argentine doctors see favorable aspects in the implementation of AI.

freepik

The need for regulation

From the same work it emerges that a 72% of Argentine doctors They consider it essential that the use of AI in medicine is under government oversight or medical associations. And the percentage reaches 84% ​​when asked about the need to give a legal framework to artificial intelligence applied to health.

On the other hand, the majority of doctors in the three countries also expressed their doubts in relation to the possible risks of generative AIsuch as ChatGPT, in accessing medical information. He 92% of doctors in Argentina considers it “very” or “somewhat” likely that patients will receive incorrect information through these tools.

The use of AI in medicine

Although the majority of doctors still do not use AI in their daily practice, 70% of professionals in the three countries indicate that contemplate its use in the near future. Areas where AI is already being applied by professionals in Argentina include disease research (16%) and administrative tasks (13%).

However, the use of AI for clinical tasks remains the subject of controversy. Although 60% of doctors are willing to use it to diagnose conditions and 45% to guide treatment, almost a third and half of the total are respectively oppose to those applications of technology.

Another aspect that emerges from the study is the perception that AI could reduce the risk of medical negligence. In Argentina, around 60% of doctors They agree that technology could help reduce human errors.

Although the majority of doctors in the three countries have a neutral or positive view on the future of AI in medicine, the implementation of technology remains a celic process. He 60% of Argentine doctors is shown enthusiastic about the possibilities associated with the application of these technologies, although many insist on the importance of control remaining with the doctor when making critical decisions.

Source: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts