The Government threw Rodolfo Bar from the Treasury Procurement and analyzes its replacement

The Government threw Rodolfo Bar from the Treasury Procurement and analyzes its replacement

In the midst of pressures within the government, the departure of the legal authority of the ruling was defined.

Na

The cycle of Rodolfo Bar at the head of the Treasury procurement of the national government. The current administration decided to move him from his role after a year in his position, in which he had to respond to the management initiatives that reached judicialization.

“The government has just asked for the resignation of Nation Treasury Attorney Rodolfo Barra. His replacement will be defined next Monday by the president of the Nation, “was the message of the presidential spokesman, Manuel Adorniwhich formalized the decision. The first transcendents point out that their eventual replacement could be Ricardo Manuel Rojas, Exjuez criminal, who would have been summoned to the Casa Rosada.

Baro, 77, was Judge of the Supreme Court of Justice During the ’90s, a decade where he was also conventional constituent and Minister of Justice of the Nationunder the presidency of Carlos Menem. His experience was complemented with the ownership of the General Audit of the Nation between 1999 and 2002.

Rodolfo Barra’s role

The beginning of the management of Rodolfo Bar in front of the Procurement of the Treasury of the Nation It was busy. He DNU 70/2023 who announced Javier Milei A few days after assuming involved a succession of judicializations that the lawyer had to sustain. At that time, already expects the Supreme Court Solve Los Amparos, said in an interview to Radio Rivadavia that “The country is in a terrible situation” And I know “They need emergency measures”.

Subsequently, the official had his first visit to the Chamber of Deputies in the middle of the debate of the Omnibus law. There he returned to support the substantial transformations of the government understanding that “to defend constitutional rights it would be necessary to allow the Constitution to remain in force: If there is an economic crisis, there will be no current constitution

His subsequent visit to Congress went to the Constitutional Affairs Commission When, precisely, a reform of the DNUS regime was discussed. There the attorney developed an ambiguous defense: “The assessment of necessity and urgency has been political and is part of the special dialogue between the Executive Power and the Legislative, which is somehow A tool that the Constitution puts into the hands of the President to treat the Congress to legislate in front of certain cases

Source: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts