A ruling of the Supreme Court of the end of 2024 ordered that the decisions of the national chambers must be reviewed by the Superior Court of Justice of the City of Buenos Aires. There are several questions.
In the midst of the questions to the ruling of the Supreme Court that establishes that the decisions of the national chambers must be reviewed by the Superior Court of Justice (TSJ) Porteñothis high court decided this Friday Suspend until Monday, February 17, the deadlines for filing resources.
“It is reasonable to dispose of the suspension of the deadline for filing all the resources provided by Law 402 En the scope of this Court that come from the ordinary national privileges of the CABA, ”said the TSJ in an agreed person where they established that on February 17 as the new day of the start of the computation for resource interpositions.
The court ruling is questioned by the judges of different national chambers of CABAwho already convened agreements to define a strategy against the decision of the highest court in the country. They maintain that the ruling gave the Superior Court of Buenos Aires the power to review their sentences.
Supreme Courts Justice
Mariano Fuchila
In addition to the cameramen, different associations of magistrates and lawyers question the court ruling. For example, the Association of Magistrates and officials of the Justice of the Nation (AMFJN) He had asked the Supreme Court to revocate the “Levinas” ruling that gives power to the Superior Court of Justice of CABA to review the failures of national justice and that the effects of all decisions in which the Porteño TSJ is the reviewer is suspended of the resolutions of national judges.
The warning of the Supreme Court: “Its precedents must be followed”
In the first agreement after the Summer Judicial Fair, the Supreme Court signed on Thursday 211 sentences, and in one of them recalled that its precedents must be followed.
This is the “Raskovsky, Luis Ernesto c/ Perrone, Gabriela Alejandra s/ Executive”, in which it was resolved on a process in which an auction of a property located in the town of Castelar had been ordered.
The members of the Court highlighted in that ruling that “… it would be extremely inconvenient for the community if the precedents were not duly considered and consequently followed”
In this case, the Court declared a appeal filed against a sentence that had declared the unconstitutionality of Law 14432 of the Province of Buenos Aires. Dictated in 2012, for the “Unique Housing Protection and Permanent Occupation”.
The conflict is related to a process for the collection of a promissory note, in which the property auction had been ordered.
Source: Ambito
David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.
