Government’s strategy with the new “Linked” Bono

Government’s strategy with the new “Linked” Bono

The issuance of a financial instrument called “Linked weight” bonus by the National Treasury, in articulation with the Central Bank of the Argentine Republic (BCRA)responds to an economic policy strategy aimed at accumulating international reserves without intervening directly in the exchange market. This decision is produced in a context of persistent external restrictions, high dollarization of private portfolios and an unsatisfied structural demand for foreign currency, which stresses the sustainability of macroeconomic equilibrium.

The “Linked” bond is characterized by having the US dollar as a subscription currency, while its withholding – in nominal and interest terms – is indexed to the evolution of the official wholesale exchange rate of the Argentine peso. Consequently, its main attraction lies in offering investors coverage in the face of the devaluation of the local currency without the need to liquidate dollars in the official market, which preserves the fragile position of net reserves of the BCRA.

From the perspective of institutional investors, fundamentally coverage funds and non -resident holders, the attraction of this instrument lies both in the expectation of controlled depreciation of the weight and in the possibility of accessing implicit rates of return that, even with a latent sovereign risk, exceed equivalent yields in other emerging jurisdictions. This logic responds to the differential that is generated between the debt curve in pesos adjusted by exchange rate and similar assets issued in hard currency.

The operational design of this bonus imposes a series of macro and microeconomic conditions for its success. First of all, The treasure must ensure that the evolution of the official exchange rate follows a credible and predictable trajectoryso that the agents do not anticipate an abrupt exchange correction that would erode the calculation base of the instrument. Second, the placement must be carried out with criteria of segmentation by type of fork, establishing differentiated access thresholds for residents and non -residents, in order to avoid imbalances in the external possession of public liabilities.

One of the implicit objectives in this strategy is to capture the entry of funds in the short term to increase the level of gross reserves. For this, the Economic Administration considers that the “Linked” bonds can act as a “trusted bridge” so that speculative capital partially returns to the formal circuit. This conception is part of the gradualist approach adopted since the beginning of 2025, which seeks to avoid disruptive leaps in the nominal variables while fiscal stability is consolidated.

In operational terms, the placement mechanism will be structured under the competitive tender modality, channeled through the primary placement system of the Ministry of Finance. Participants must submit offers expressed in US dollars, although the liquidation will be carried out in pesos at the official exchange rate in force at the time of the award. In this way, the Government avoids direct entry of foreign exchange to the official change market, but computes those currencies as gross reserves in the accounting of the BCRA, increasing its fire power in the management of expectations.

This strategy presents immediate accounting benefits, since it allows to improve the profile of international assets without compromising short -term exchange parity. However, it also implies assuming a contingent liability that will grow in nominal terms if weight depreciation is accelerated. Therefore, the quasi -fiscal risk derived from this instrument will depend critically on the future path of the exchange rate and the expiration horizon, which must be carefully staggered to avoid payment concentrations at critical moments of the financial calendar.

From the optics of the BCRA balance, the “Linked” bonds will work as an indirect form of sterilization of weights and strengthening external assets. Although it is not about direct liabilities of the central, the eventual anticipated rescue of these titles or their eventual exchange per debt in dollars could imply a significant monetary cost if fiscal and exchange policies are not properly coordinated.

At the systemic level, the success of the placement could have multiplier effects on local financial markets. On the one hand, it would encourage the formation of a sovereign yield curve in local currency adjusted by exchange rate, which would expand the instrument menu available for portfolio administrators. On the other hand, it would offer an alternative exchange coverage tool to the future dollar, potentially reducing the pressure on the derivatives market and discouraging speculative operations in the informal square.

The effect on the exchange gap also deserves attention. Although the bonus does not imply liquidation of dollars, its existence allows us to absorb part of the coverage demand in legal instruments, which could contribute to a compression of the gap between the official exchange rate and financial parallels. This hypothesis will depend, however, on the level of confidence of the market in the macroeconomic trajectory and the ability of the government to sustain its exchange policy without shock.

The impact on net reserves, which is one of the main objectives of the measure, must be analyzed cautiously. Although the accounting calculation allows to improve gross reserves, the effect on net reserves is conditioned by the real liquidity of the currencies involved and their availability to face external commitments. In this sense, it is possible that the instrument is more effective in improving short -term solvency indicators than to solve the structural tensions of payments.

The issuance of this bond represents a tactical tool within the Argentine government arsenal to stabilize expectations, strengthen international reserves and improve the perception of macroeconomic sustainability in the short term. Its design aims to attract financial flows without exerting direct pressure on the exchange market, and at the same time offers coverage against devaluations for investors that are committed to an orderly exit of the current monetary transition.

However, the real challenge lies in sustaining the credibility of this instrument over time. The effectiveness of its implementation will depend not only on the specific contractual conditions, but also on the fulfillment of the tax program, the consistency of the exchange anchor and the evolution of inflationary expectations. In that sense, beyond the immediate benefits it may offer, the “Linked” Bonus does not replace the need for a comprehensive economic policy frame that provides clear and sustainable signals to market actors. The magnitude of its success, therefore, will be closely linked to the government’s ability to transform this conjunctural tool in part of a medium -term financial standardization strategy.

Source: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts