Federal Constitutional Court
Disprint against US drone inserts via Ramstein
Copy the current link
Add to the memorial list
The Palatinate Air Base Ramstein played a role in US drone attacks in Yemen. Therefore, two Yemeni citizens had sued. Now the verdict fell.
According to a judgment of the Federal Constitutional Court, Germany can have an obligation to protect against people abroad under certain conditions. Among other things, there must be a sufficient connection to the state authority of the Federal Republic, decided the highest German court in Karlsruhe. Second, there must be a serious risk of systematic violation of applicable international law.
With a view to US drone inserts that are technically controlled via the Air Base Ramstein in the Palatinate, the second Senate did not consider the conditions to be fulfilled. A constitutional complaint was unsuccessful.
Fatal use from Ramstein in Yemen
The complainants are two Yemeni nationals whose relatives were killed in their homeland in 2012 in the event of a US drone mission. The case has been employing the German judiciary for more than ten years. Because of the role of the military base in Rhineland-Palatinate, the plaintiffs also see the federal government in responsibility.
The American armed forces had informed the Federal Ministry of Defense in 2010 that a satellite relay station for control was built on the site in Ramstein in Palatinate, even tilting drones abroad. According to court, the ministry saw no concerns.
Dpa
LW
Source: Stern

I have been working in the news industry for over 6 years, first as a reporter and now as an editor. I have covered politics extensively, and my work has appeared in major newspapers and online news outlets around the world. In addition to my writing, I also contribute regularly to 24 Hours World.