AfD Brandenburg violates human dignity, according to the protection of the constitution

AfD Brandenburg violates human dignity, according to the protection of the constitution

State Association in East Germany
AfD in Brandenburg violates human dignity, according to the protection of the constitution








With an urgent application, the AfD wanted to prevent the constitutional protection from being classified as secure right -wing extremist. This has been rejected and a report follows.

From the perspective of the protection of the constitution, the Brandenburg State Association of the AfD violates the human dignity and the constitution of the federal state. This emerges from the note of the state constitutional protection for the classification of the party as secure right -wing extremist, which Interior Minister René Wilke (independent) and the head of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, Wilfried Peters, introduced in Potsdam on Thursday. He was published on the Internet at the same time.



The funds of the rule of law would have to be used to dissuade the AfD from its anti -constitutional path and to let them feel the consequences, said Wilke. “In this way, the classification of the AfD state association Brandenburg as secure right-wing extremist endeavor and the publication of the documents of the constitutional protection, which confirm this, is an important step.”

AfD officials discredit minorities publicly

Among other things, the classification as secure right -wing extremist struts leads to the fact that intelligence agents can be used more effectively and more easily. The classification is also the basis for possible further steps, such as a ban procedure, said Wilke. At the same time, he emphasized that this was still a long way off. “But if you continue to radicalize yourself, then you run out on prohibition procedures.” The AfD is rightly “highly nervous” because it realized that its path leads to illegality.


According to the new Protection of the Protection of the Protection of the Constitution Peters, the classification of Peters is that the AfD state association Brandenburg endeavors to eliminate the elementary constitutional loyalty through violations of human dignity. By discussing larger groups of people the human rights, they contradict the Basic Law and the Brandenburg Constitution.




Reiner Haseloff

The H question: Does Saxony-Anhalt fall to the AfD?


Peters mentioned a quote from AfD parliamentary group leader Hans-Christoph Berndt as an example, according to which Germany should remain a country of Germans and also had to be subjected to part of the Germans of remigration. According to this, German citizens, who, from the AfD’s point of view, should also have to leave the country, for example because they belong to Muslim faith.


Gregor Peter Schmitz with the letters GPS

Don’t you want to miss anything from the star?

Personally, competent and entertaining: Editor -in -chief Gregor Peter Schmitz sends you the most important content from the star-Credaction and arranges what Germany talks about.

According to the Protection of the Constitution, this is a violation of human dignity in accordance with the case law, because people are dismissed the right as a citizen and they should be turned into people.





Wilke emphasized that not all AfD members in Brandenburg are now to be regarded as right-wing extremists. However, there is now a supporter that supports the AfD like a kind of football club, regardless of its achievements. These supporters moved in a kind of cultural common room, said Wilke. So far, this has been observed more with radicalized football clubs or “sect -like conglomerates”.

AfD prevents the constitutional protection report initially prevented

There had been disputes about the publication of the note. After the classification of the AfD state association became known in early May, the party, on the other hand, submitted urgent application to the Potsdam Administrative Court. The protection of the constitution then temporarily exposed the classification and gave a so -called standstill declaration. Since then, the protection of the constitution has not been reported on the high level and the state association was treated as a suspected case before.

The claim of the AfD to publish the note so that the citizens could get an idea of the “amateur work” of the protection of the constitution, Wilke had refused with reference to the pending urgent application to the administrative court. After this was withdrawn by the AfD, the note was published and the party was now once again described as secured right -wing extremist.

AFP

CL

Source: Stern

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts