The deportation of refugees who have entered Rwanda illegally from Great Britain can no longer be legally stopped. The first plane to Kigali is scheduled to take off tonight. But there are far fewer people on board than expected.
Great Britain plans to deport asylum seekers who have entered the country illegally to Rwanda by plane for the first time on Tuesday, despite heavy criticism. “I can’t say exactly how many people will be on board,” British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss told Sky News on Tuesday. “The really important thing is that we introduce the principle.” The business model of people smuggling across the English Channel must be “broken”.
According to activists, the first plane to the East African country should take off from one of London’s airports on Wednesday night and land in Kigali on Wednesday.
Originally, 31 asylum seekers were to be flown out on the chartered plane. According to the organization Care4Calais, the tickets of 23 of those affected have now been canceled. The machine is now expected to start with only eight migrants to be deported on board, the organization said on Twitter. Among them are Albanians, Iraqis, Iranians and a Syrian. Truss only said succinctly: “There will be people on board. And if you’re not on this flight, take the next one.”
London’s controversial deal with Rwanda
London had signed an agreement with Rwanda to fly out illegal migrants to the East African country in exchange for payments. There they should be given the opportunity to apply for asylum. However, even if they are recognized as refugees, no return to Great Britain is envisaged.
This is to deter people from trying to enter the UK illegally. Refugee and human rights organizations and the PCS union, which represents British border guards, had appealed against this, but had failed in court.
Activists criticize the agreement as immoral, dangerous and counterproductive. According to observers, the human rights situation in East African Rwanda is anything but ideal. The UN had also repeatedly criticized the British project.
Church leaders, including the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, sharply attacked the government for its asylum policy on Tuesday. “Our Christian heritage should inspire us to treat asylum seekers with compassion, fairness and justice,” Welby and 24 other bishops wrote in The Times. “This immoral policy is a disgrace to Britain.” Truss dismissed the criticism. “Our policy is perfectly legal, perfectly moral.”
Pro Asyl sees “dangerous precedent”
The human rights organization Pro Asyl sees the deportations as a “dangerous precedent”. “It is at the core of the Geneva Refugee Protection Convention to take responsibility for the protection of asylum seekers and refugees,” explained Pro-Asyl Managing Director Günter Burkhardt. Great Britain, however, evades this responsibility. “Then nothing is left of refugee protection but an empty phrase.”
EU member Denmark announced similar plans last summer. According to a law there, asylum seekers should be taken to a reception center outside the EU after they have registered at the border. The Danish government signed a declaration of intent with Rwanda on cooperation in the area of asylum and migration.
Source: Stern
David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.
